» Articles » PMID: 17968142

Mesosternal Bristle Number in a Cosmopolitan Drosophilid: an X-linked Variable Trait Independent of Sternopleural Bristles

Overview
Journal J Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2007 Oct 31
PMID 17968142
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mesosternal (MS) bristles in Drosophila are a pair of machrochaetae found at the sternal end of the sternopleural (STP) microchaetae, and are thought to be invariable. In a closely related drosophilid genus, Zaprionus, their number is four and, in contrast to Drosophila, they show interspecific and intraspecific variability. The genetic basis of MS bristle number variability was studied in Z. indianus, the only cosmopolitan species of the genus. The trait responded rapidly to selection and two lines were obtained, one lacking any bristles (0-0) and the other bearing the normal phenotype (2-2). Other symmetrical phenotypes, (1-1) and (3-3), could also be selected for, but with lesser success. By contrast, STP bristle number did not vary significantly between the two lines (0-0) and (2-2), revealing its genetic independence from MS bristle number. Reciprocal crosses between these two lines showed that MS bristle number is mainly influenced by a major gene on the X chromosome (i.e. F(1) males always resembled their mothers) with codominant expression (i.e. heterozygous F(1) females harboured an average phenotype of 2 bristles). However, trait penetrance was incomplete and backcrosses revealed that this variability was partly due to genetic modifiers, most likely autosomal. The canalization of MS bristle number was investigated under different temperatures, and the increased appearance of abnormal phenotypes mainly occurred at extreme temperatures. There was a bias, however, towards bristle loss, as shown by a liability (developmental map) analysis. Finally, when ancestral and introduced populations were compared, the latter were far less stable, suggesting that genetic bottlenecks may perturb the MS bristle number canalization system. MS bristle number, thus, appears to be an excellent model for investigating developmental canalization at both the quantitative and the molecular level.

Citing Articles

Population transcriptomics: insights from Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia and their hybrids.

Wurmser F, Ogereau D, Mary-Huard T, Loriod B, Joly D, Montchamp-Moreau C Genetica. 2011; 139(4):465-77.

PMID: 21424276 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-011-9566-0.

References
1.
Usui-Ishihara A, Simpson P . Differences in sensory projections between macro- and microchaetes in Drosophilid flies. Dev Biol. 2004; 277(1):170-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.09.017. View

2.
Polak M . Ectoparasitism in mothers causes higher positional fluctuating asymmetry in their sons: implications for sexual selection. Am Nat. 1997; 149(5):955-74. DOI: 10.1086/286032. View

3.
Mackay T, Lyman R, Lawrence F . Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: Mapping spontaneous mutations affecting sensory bristle number. Genetics. 2005; 170(4):1723-35. PMC: 1449762. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.032581. View

4.
Bubliy O, Loeschcke V, Imasheva A . Effect of stressful and nonstressful growth temperatures on variation of sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 2000; 54(4):1444-9. DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1444:eosang]2.0.co;2. View

5.
Moreteau B, Gibert P, Delpuech J, Petavy G, David J . Phenotypic plasticity of sternopleural bristle number in temperate and tropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 2003; 81(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672302005967. View