» Articles » PMID: 17964474

Evaluation of Bone Height and Bone Density After Tooth Extraction: an Experimental Study in Minipigs

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2007 Oct 30
PMID 17964474
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to radiographically quantify bone density and bone height preservation in tooth extraction alveolus filled with xenograft.

Study Design: The maxillary and mandibular fourth deciduous molars and fourth premolars of 6 minipigs were removed. Randomly, in 3 animals the right side was used as the test side and in the other 3 animals the left side was the test side. Intraoral radiographs were performed to compare the condition at the initial time and 3 months later. Measurements of bone height and bone density were performed using KS300 (Zeiss) software.

Results: After 3 months, there was a statistically significant smaller bone height loss for the test group. The test group presented a statistically greater bone density immediately after tooth extraction. However, after 3 months there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.

Conclusions: The results suggest that treatment of postextraction alveolus with xenograft can preserve bone height initially but differences in bone density compared to when no xenograft is used are not sustained.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Radiodensity at Mandibular Periapical Bone Sites using Three-Dimensional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Goyushov S, Asar N, Tozum T J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2023; 14(1):e2.

PMID: 37180408 PMC: 10170661. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2023.14102.


Computed tomography and histological evaluation of xenogenic and biomimetic bone grafts in three-wall alveolar defects in minipigs.

Raymond Y, Pastorino D, Ginebreda I, Maazouz Y, Ortiz M, Manzanares M Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25(12):6695-6706.

PMID: 33931811 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03956-y.


Comparison of extraction sites versus artificial defects with xenogenic bone substitute in minipigs.

Steiner C, Karl M, Laschke M, Schupbach P, Venturato A, Gasser A Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021; 7(4):490-501.

PMID: 33398935 PMC: 8404495. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.390.


Comparison of platelet rich plasma and synthetic graft material for bone regeneration after third molar extraction.

Nathani D, Sequeira J, Rao B Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 5(2):213-8.

PMID: 26981473 PMC: 4772563. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.175762.


Clinical evaluations of mineralized collagen in the extraction sites preservation.

Feng L, Zhang L, Cui Y, Song T, Qiu Z, Wang X Regen Biomater. 2016; 3(1):41-8.

PMID: 26815224 PMC: 4723274. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbv027.