» Articles » PMID: 17963294

Metastatic Suppressor Genes Inactivated by Aberrant Methylation in Gastric Cancer

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2007 Oct 30
PMID 17963294
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To screen out the differentially methylated DNA sequences between gastric primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes, test the methylation difference of gene PTPRG between primary gastric tumor and metastatic lymph nodes, and test the regulatory function of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine which is an agent with suppression on methylation and the level of methylation in gastric cancer cell line.

Methods: Methylated DNA sequences in genome were enriched with methylated CpG islands amplification (MCA) to undergo representational difference analysis (RDA), with MCA production of metastatic lymph nodes as tester and that of primary tumor as driver. The obtained differentially methylated fragments were cloned and sequenced to acquire the base sequence, which was analyzed with bioinformatics. With methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and RT-PCR, methylation difference of gene PTPRG was detected between primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes in 36 cases of gastric cancer. Methylation of gene PTPRG and its regulated expression were observed in gastric cancer cell line before and after being treated with methylation-suppressive agent.

Results: Nineteen differentially methylated sequences were obtained and located at 5' end, exons, introns and 3' end, in which KL59 was observed to be located at 9p21 as the first exon of gene p16 and KL22 to be located at promoter region of PRPRG. KL22, as the probes, was hybridized with driver, tester and 3-round RDA products respectively with all positive signals except with the driver. Significant difference was observed in both methylation rate of gene PTPRG and PTPRG mRNA expression rate between primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes. Demethylation of gene PTPRG, with recovered expression of PTPRG mRNA, was observed after gastric cancer cell line being treated with methylation-suppressive agent.

Conclusion: Difference exists in DNA methylation between primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes of gastric cancer, with MCA-RDA as one of the good analytical methods. Significant difference exists in methylation of gene PTPRG between primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes of gastric cancer. Methylation level in gastric cancer cell line can be decreased by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, which is the methylation-suppressive agent, with PTPRG expression being recovered.

Citing Articles

Aberrant DNA methylation of PTPRG as one possible mechanism of its under-expression in CML patients in the State of Qatar.

Ismail M, Samara M, Al Sayab A, Alsharshani M, Yassin M, Varadharaj G Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020; 8(10):e1319.

PMID: 32700424 PMC: 7549574. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1319.


Protein tyrosine phosphatases: promising targets in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Ruckert M, Andrade P, Santos V, Silveira V Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019; 76(13):2571-2592.

PMID: 30982078 PMC: 11105579. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03095-4.


Tumor suppressor SET9 guides the epigenetic plasticity of breast cancer cells and serves as an early-stage biomarker for predicting metastasis.

Montenegro M, Sanchez-Del-Campo L, Gonzalez-Guerrero R, Martinez-Barba E, Pinero-Madrona A, Cabezas-Herrera J Oncogene. 2016; 35(47):6143-6152.

PMID: 27132511 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.154.


Prognostic implication of PTPRH hypomethylation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Sato T, Soejima K, Arai E, Hamamoto J, Yasuda H, Arai D Oncol Rep. 2015; 34(3):1137-45.

PMID: 26134684 PMC: 4530927. DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4082.


PTPRG suppresses tumor growth and invasion via inhibition of Akt signaling in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Cheung A, Ip J, Chu A, Cheng Y, Leong M, Ko J Oncotarget. 2015; 6(15):13434-47.

PMID: 25970784 PMC: 4537025. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3876.


References
1.
Liu L, Xiao W, Liu W . Effect of 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine on the P16 tumor suppressor gene in hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2. World J Gastroenterol. 2002; 7(1):131-5. PMC: 4688690. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i1.131. View

2.
Lisitsyn N, Wigler M . Cloning the differences between two complex genomes. Science. 1993; 259(5097):946-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.8438152. View

3.
Costello J, Fruhwald M, Smiraglia D, Rush L, Robertson G, Gao X . Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns. Nat Genet. 2000; 24(2):132-8. DOI: 10.1038/72785. View

4.
Herman J, Graff J, Myohanen S, Nelkin B, Baylin S . Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(18):9821-6. PMC: 38513. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9821. View

5.
Teodoridis J, Hall J, Marsh S, Kannall H, Smyth C, Curto J . CpG island methylation of DNA damage response genes in advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(19):8961-7. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1187. View