» Articles » PMID: 17961242

Identifying Dynamical Modules from Genetic Regulatory Systems: Applications to the Segment Polarity Network

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Oct 27
PMID 17961242
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is widely accepted that genetic regulatory systems are 'modular', in that the whole system is made up of smaller 'subsystems' corresponding to specific biological functions. Most attempts to identify modules in genetic regulatory systems have relied on the topology of the underlying network. However, it is the temporal activity (dynamics) of genes and proteins that corresponds to biological functions, and hence it is dynamics that we focus on here for identifying subsystems.

Results: Using Boolean network models as an exemplar, we present a new technique to identify subsystems, based on their dynamical properties. The main part of the method depends only on the stable dynamics (attractors) of the system, thus requiring no prior knowledge of the underlying network. However, knowledge of the logical relationships between the network components can be used to describe how each subsystem is regulated. To demonstrate its applicability to genetic regulatory systems, we apply the method to a model of the Drosophila segment polarity network, providing a detailed breakdown of the system.

Conclusion: We have designed a technique for decomposing any set of discrete-state, discrete-time attractors into subsystems. Having a suitable mathematical model also allows us to describe how each subsystem is regulated and how robust each subsystem is against perturbations. However, since the subsystems are found directly from the attractors, a mathematical model or underlying network topology is not necessarily required to identify them, potentially allowing the method to be applied directly to experimental expression data.

Citing Articles

Molecular characterization of projection neuron subtypes in the mouse olfactory bulb.

Zeppilli S, Ackels T, Attey R, Klimpert N, Ritola K, Boeing S Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 34292150 PMC: 8352594. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.65445.


Dynamical modules in metabolism, cell and developmental biology.

Jaeger J, Monk N Interface Focus. 2021; 11(3):20210011.

PMID: 34055307 PMC: 8086940. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0011.


On the specificity of gene regulatory networks: How does network co-option affect subsequent evolution?.

McQueen E, Rebeiz M Curr Top Dev Biol. 2020; 139:375-405.

PMID: 32450967 PMC: 8382235. DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.03.002.


Modularity, criticality, and evolvability of a developmental gene regulatory network.

Verd B, Monk N, Jaeger J Elife. 2019; 8.

PMID: 31169494 PMC: 6645726. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.42832.


Bioattractors: dynamical systems theory and the evolution of regulatory processes.

Jaeger J, Monk N J Physiol. 2014; 592(11):2267-81.

PMID: 24882812 PMC: 4048087. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.272385.


References
1.
Kato M, Hata N, Banerjee N, Futcher B, Zhang M . Identifying combinatorial regulation of transcription factors and binding motifs. Genome Biol. 2004; 5(8):R56. PMC: 507881. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-8-r56. View

2.
Ingram P, Stumpf M, Stark J . Network motifs: structure does not determine function. BMC Genomics. 2006; 7:108. PMC: 1488845. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-108. View

3.
Resendis-Antonio O, Freyre-Gonzalez J, Menchaca-Mendez R, Gutierrez-Rios R, Martinez-Antonio A, Avila-Sanchez C . Modular analysis of the transcriptional regulatory network of E. coli. Trends Genet. 2005; 21(1):16-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.11.010. View

4.
Albert R, Othmer H . The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J Theor Biol. 2003; 223(1):1-18. PMC: 6388622. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00035-3. View

5.
Newman M, Girvan M . Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004; 69(2 Pt 2):026113. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113. View