» Articles » PMID: 17959407

Purification and Detailed Study of Two Clinically Different Human Glucose 6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Variants, G6PD(Plymouth) and G6PD(Mahidol): Evidence for Defective Protein Folding As the Basis of Disease

Overview
Journal Mol Genet Metab
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2007 Oct 26
PMID 17959407
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In an attempt to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency caused by two mutations, G6PD(Plymouth) (G163D) and G6PD(Mahidol) (G163S), the two variants were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis and expressed in G6PD-deficient E. coli DF 213 cells. A first indication of impaired folding came from problems in expressing these clinical mutants, which were only overcome by lowering the growth temperature or co-expressing with molecular chaperones (GroEL and GroES). Both strategies significantly increased soluble expression of recombinant G6PD(Plymouth) and G6PD(Mahidol), judged by both G6PD activity in extracts and the amount of immunoreactive protein. Using a modified 3-step protocol, the two mutant enzymes were successfully purified for the first time. Steady-state kinetic parameters (K(m) for NADP(+), K(m) for G6P and k(cat)) of the two mutants are very similar to the wild-type values, indicating that the catalytic efficiency of the two mutants remains unchanged. The two mutants are, however, markedly less stable than wild-type G6PD in both thermostability and urea-induced inactivation tests. In a typical experiment at 37 degrees C and pH 7.2 after 24h G6PD WT, G6PD(Mahidol) and G6PD(Plymouth) retained 58.3%, 27.0% and 3.9%, respectively, of their corresponding initial activity. The stability of all three enzymes is enhanced by addition of NADP(+). According to unfolding and refolding experiments, the two mutants are impaired in their folding properties. Thus structural instability appears to be the molecular basis of the clinical phenotype in G6PD(Plymouth) and G6PD(Mahidol) and in particular of the differing clinical severity of the two mutations. The 3-D structure solved for G6PD(Canton) allows an interpretation of these effects in terms of steric hindrance.

Citing Articles

An Overall View of the Functional and Structural Characterization of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Variants in the Mexican Population.

Hernandez-Ochoa B, Ortega-Cuellar D, Gonzalez-Valdez A, Martinez-Rosas V, Morales-Luna L, Rojas-Alarcon M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).

PMID: 37628871 PMC: 10454679. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612691.


Production and differential activity of recombinant human wild-type G6PD and G6PD.

Vengidasan L, Yunus M, Mohd Yusoff N, Yahaya B, Ismail I Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2023; 14(4):159-167.

PMID: 37551388 PMC: 10373393. DOI: 10.1515/abm-2020-0023.


Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: Insights on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Gene Variants in Disease Heterogeneity.

Lee H, Ithnin A, Azma R, Othman A, Salvador A, Cheah F Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:875877.

PMID: 35685917 PMC: 9170901. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.875877.


Prevalence of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) Deficiency among Malaria Patients in Southern Thailand: 8 Years Retrospective Study.

Khammanee T, Sawangjaroen N, Buncherd H, Tun A, Thanapongpichat S Korean J Parasitol. 2022; 60(1):15-23.

PMID: 35247950 PMC: 8898650. DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2022.60.1.15.


Whole-genome sequencing association analysis of quantitative red blood cell phenotypes: The NHLBI TOPMed program.

Hu Y, Stilp A, McHugh C, Rao S, Jain D, Zheng X Am J Hum Genet. 2021; 108(5):874-893.

PMID: 33887194 PMC: 8206199. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.04.003.