A briefly exposed visual stimulus may not be consciously perceived if it is preceded and followed by a dissimilar visual pattern or mask. Despite the subject's lack of awareness, prior behavioral studies have shown that such masked stimuli, nevertheless, engage domain-specific processes [Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., et al. Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752-758, 2001; Bar, M., & Biederman, I. Subliminal visual priming. Psychological Science, 9, 464-469, 1998; Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600, 1998; Whalen, P. J., Rauch, S. L., Etcoff, N. L., McInerney, S. C., Lee, M. B., & Jenike, M. A. Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 411-418, 1998; Marcel, A. J. Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197-237, 1983]. Masking thus provides a method for identifying language processes that are preattentive and automatic. Functional magnetic resonance imaging used in concert with masking may identify brain regions engaged by these unconscious language processes. In an adaptation design, subjects viewed a continuous stream of masked words and masked nonwords while performing an unrelated detection task, in which they were asked to make a response to a visible colored nonword stimulus (i.e., ampersands in red or blue font). Most trials were masked nonwords and masked words were presented once every 12-15 sec. The task ensured participant engagement, while the masked nonword baseline controlled for perceptual and orthographic processing. Participants were naïve to the purpose of the experiment and testing indicated that they did not consciously perceive either the words or nonwords. Masked words, but not masked nonwords, strongly activated left hemisphere language regions, including Broca's area, the angular gyrus, and the lateral temporal lobe. Differential activation of the posterior corpus callosum was also observed.
Citing Articles
ObScene database: Semantic congruency norms for 898 pairs of object-scene pictures.
Andrade M, Cipriano M, Raposo A
Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(4):3058-3071.
PMID: 37488464
PMC: 11133025.
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02181-7.
Network-level dynamics underlying a combined rTMS and psychotherapy treatment for major depressive disorder: An exploratory network analysis.
Davis S, Beynel L, Neacsiu A, Luber B, Bernhardt E, Lisanby S
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023; 23(4):100382.
PMID: 36922930
PMC: 10009060.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100382.
The Effects of Word Identity, Case, and SOA on Word Priming in a Subliminal Context.
Peel H, Royals K, Chouinard P
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021; 51(1):1-15.
PMID: 34019216
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-021-09783-2.
Delayed access to conscious processing in multiple sclerosis: Reduced cortical activation and impaired structural connectivity.
Has Silemek A, Ranjeva J, Audoin B, Heesen C, Gold S, Kuhn S
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 42(11):3379-3395.
PMID: 33826184
PMC: 8249884.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25440.
Neural signatures of promotion versus prevention goal priming: fMRI evidence for distinct cognitive-motivational systems.
Detloff A, Hariri A, Strauman T
Personal Neurosci. 2020; 3:e1.
PMID: 32435748
PMC: 7219697.
DOI: 10.1017/pen.2019.13.
The relative contributions of visual and semantic information in the neural representation of object categories.
Victoria L, Pyles J, Tarr M
Brain Behav. 2019; 9(10):e01373.
PMID: 31560175
PMC: 6790305.
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1373.
The Semantic Integration Between Two Subliminally Perceived Words Simultaneously Presented at Different Locations.
Tu S, Liu C, Zhu S, Jou J, Zhou Y, Wan S
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019; 48(5):1087-1110.
PMID: 31102173
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-019-09648-9.
On the Concurrent Use of Self-System Therapy and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Treatment for Depression.
Neacsiu A, Luber B, Davis S, Bernhardt E, Strauman T, Lisanby S
J ECT. 2018; 34(4):266-273.
PMID: 30308570
PMC: 6242750.
DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000545.
Four Functionally Distinct Regions in the Left Supramarginal Gyrus Support Word Processing.
Oberhuber M, Hope T, Seghier M, Parker Jones O, Prejawa S, Green D
Cereb Cortex. 2016; 26(11):4212-4226.
PMID: 27600852
PMC: 5066832.
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw251.
Dough, tough, cough, rough: A "fast" fMRI localizer of component processes in reading.
Malins J, Gumkowski N, Buis B, Molfese P, Rueckl J, Frost S
Neuropsychologia. 2016; 91:394-406.
PMID: 27592331
PMC: 5089170.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.027.
Near-instant automatic access to visually presented words in the human neocortex: neuromagnetic evidence.
Shtyrov Y, MacGregor L
Sci Rep. 2016; 6:26558.
PMID: 27217080
PMC: 4877599.
DOI: 10.1038/srep26558.
Eyes on words: A fixation-related fMRI study of the left occipito-temporal cortex during self-paced silent reading of words and pseudowords.
Schuster S, Hawelka S, Richlan F, Ludersdorfer P, Hutzler F
Sci Rep. 2015; 5:12686.
PMID: 26235228
PMC: 4522675.
DOI: 10.1038/srep12686.
Task dependent lexicality effects support interactive models of reading: a meta-analytic neuroimaging review.
McNorgan C, Chabal S, OYoung D, Lukic S, Booth J
Neuropsychologia. 2014; 67:148-58.
PMID: 25524364
PMC: 4317368.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.014.
Maintenance of non-consciously presented information engages the prefrontal cortex.
Bergstrom F, Eriksson J
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:938.
PMID: 25484862
PMC: 4240068.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00938.
Neural Correlates of Subliminal Language Processing.
Axelrod V, Bar M, Rees G, Yovel G
Cereb Cortex. 2014; 25(8):2160-9.
PMID: 24557638
PMC: 4494027.
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu022.
Consciousness in humans and non-human animals: recent advances and future directions.
Boly M, Seth A, Wilke M, Ingmundson P, Baars B, Laureys S
Front Psychol. 2013; 4:625.
PMID: 24198791
PMC: 3814086.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00625.
Automatic processing of unattended lexical information in visual oddball presentation: neurophysiological evidence.
Shtyrov Y, Goryainova G, Tugin S, Ossadtchi A, Shestakova A
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:421.
PMID: 23950740
PMC: 3738864.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00421.
Fixation-related FMRI analysis in the domain of reading research: using self-paced eye movements as markers for hemodynamic brain responses during visual letter string processing.
Richlan F, Gagl B, Hawelka S, Braun M, Schurz M, Kronbichler M
Cereb Cortex. 2013; 24(10):2647-56.
PMID: 23645718
PMC: 4153805.
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht117.
What shall I be, what must I be: neural correlates of personal goal activation.
Strauman T, Detloff A, Sestokas R, Smith D, Goetz E, Rivera C
Front Integr Neurosci. 2013; 6:123.
PMID: 23316145
PMC: 3539852.
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00123.
Suppressed semantic information accelerates analytic problem solving.
Zabelina D, Guzman-Martinez E, Ortega L, Grabowecky M, Suzuki S, Beeman M
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012; 20(3):581-5.
PMID: 23250762
PMC: 3746564.
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0364-1.