» Articles » PMID: 17954711

Increasing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients: a Trend Toward More Aggressive Surgical Treatment

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2007 Oct 24
PMID 17954711
Citations 201
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Many patients with unilateral breast cancer choose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy to prevent cancer in the opposite breast. The purpose of our study was to determine the use and trends of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the United States.

Patients And Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database to review the treatment of patients with unilateral breast cancer diagnosed from 1998 through 2003. We determined the rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as a proportion of all surgically treated patients and as a proportion of all mastectomies.

Results: We identified 152,755 patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer; 4,969 patients chose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. The rate was 3.3% for all surgically treated patients; 7.7%, for patients undergoing mastectomy. The overall rate significantly increased from 1.8% in 1998 to 4.5% in 2003. Likewise, the contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate for patients undergoing mastectomy significantly increased from 4.2% in 1998 to 11.0% in 2003. These increased rates applied to all cancer stages and continued to the end of our study period. Young patient age, non-Hispanic white race, lobular histology, and previous cancer diagnosis were associated with significantly higher rates. Large tumor size was associated with a higher overall rate, but with a lower rate for patients undergoing mastectomy.

Conclusion: The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the United States more than doubled within the recent 6-year period of our study. Prospective studies are needed to understand the decision-making processes that have led to more aggressive breast cancer surgery.

Citing Articles

The Incidence of Occult Malignancy in Contralateral Risk Reducing Mastectomy Among Affected Breast Cancer Gene Mutation Carriers in South Korea.

Lee C, Shin D, Kim K, Nam S, Kim S, Yu J J Breast Cancer. 2025; 28(1):1-10.

PMID: 40047086 PMC: 11885854. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2024.0219.


Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes in Unilateral Versus Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstructions: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Tekdogan B, Martineau J, Verbat M, Dong E, Correia D, Oranges C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004590 PMC: 11856815. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041056.


Emotional Reactivity and Regulation Relate to Surgical Treatment Decision Making Among Newly Diagnosed Women With Breast Cancer.

Benedict C, Nouriani B, Neri E, Miller K, Kurian A, Gross J Cancer Med. 2024; 13(23):e70357.

PMID: 39653041 PMC: 11627588. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70357.


Unilateral Versus Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Tekdogan B, Martineau J, Kalbermatten D, Oranges C Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(12):e6359.

PMID: 39640216 PMC: 11620719. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006359.


"Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review.

Hamid S, Bakkila B, Schultz K, Grimshaw A, Gunderson C, Godfrey E Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(8):5168-5179.

PMID: 38717543 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15360-3.