Local Motion Processing in the Optic Tectum of the Japanese Toad, Bufo Japonicus

Overview

Journal J Comp Physiol A

Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Social Sciences

Date 1991 Nov 1

PMID 1795232

Citations 1

Authors

M Satou

A Shiraishi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The results of previous behavioral studies can be so interpreted that the prey-catching behavior in the toad is elicited if there is a 'local' motion restricted within a small part of the visual field, while it is suppressed if there is a 'global' motion over a large part of the visual field. This has led us to design experiments to answer a specific question (yet a very essential one for understanding neural processes underlying this behavior): Are there 'local motion detectors' in the toad's visual system that are not activated by 'global' motion over a large part of the visual field but are activated by 'local' motion confined within a smaller part of it? The present study showed that (1) the majority of the toad's tectal neurons exhibit properties of the 'local motion detectors' as defined above, and (2) these properties can be explained from the receptive field structure revealed in the present experiments. Based on these results, we suggest that the tectal 'local motion detectors' are essential for the detection and localization of small moving prey-objects in the natural environment while ignoring the large moving objects or the self-induced motion of the visual field.

Citing Articles

The roles of visual and proprioceptive information during motor program choice in frogs.

Anderson C, Nishikawa K J Comp Physiol A. 1996; 179(6):753-62.

PMID: 8956496 DOI: 10.1007/BF00207354.

References

Tsai H, Satou M, Shiraishi A, Ueda K . Effects of moving textured background on neuronal responses in the toad's optic tectum. Naturwissenschaften. 1989; 76(1):37-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00368313. View

GRUESSER O, GRUESSER-CORNEHLS U, BULLOCK T . FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF MOVEMENT DETECTING NEURONS IN THE FROG'S RETINA. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1964; 279:88-93. DOI: 10.1007/BF00363324. View

Frost B, Nakayama K . Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. Science. 1983; 220(4598):744-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.6836313. View

Satou M, Matsushima T, Takeuchi H, Ueda K . Tongue-muscle-controlling motoneurons in the Japanese toad: topography, morphology and neuronal pathways from the 'snapping-evoking area' in the optic tectum. J Comp Physiol A. 1985; 157(6):717-37. DOI: 10.1007/BF01350070. View

Langeveld S . Velocity sensitivity and directional selectivity of frog retinal ganglion cells depend on chromaticity of moving stimuli. Brain Behav Evol. 1985; 27(2-4):165-85. DOI: 10.1159/000118728. View

Grobstein P . Between the retinotectal projection and directed movement: topography of a sensorimotor interface. Brain Behav Evol. 1988; 31(1):34-48. DOI: 10.1159/000116574. View

Manteuffel G, Fiseifis S . Configuration-sensitive visual responses in the superior colliculus of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus). Brain Behav Evol. 1990; 35(3):176-84. DOI: 10.1159/000115865. View

Satou M, Ewert J . The antidromic activation of tectal neurons by electrical stimuli applied to the caudal medulla oblongata in the toad, Bufo bufo L. J Comp Physiol A. 1985; 157(6):739-48. DOI: 10.1007/BF01350071. View

Maeda M, Magherini P, Precht W . Functional organization of vestibular and visual inputs to neck and forelimb motoneurons in the frog. J Neurophysiol. 1977; 40(2):225-43. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1977.40.2.225. View

10.

Dean P, Redgrave P, Westby G . Event or emergency? Two response systems in the mammalian superior colliculus. Trends Neurosci. 1989; 12(4):137-47. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90052-0. View

11.

Maturana H, LETTVIN J, McCULLOCH W, Pitts W . Anatomy and physiology of vision in the frog (Rana pipiens). J Gen Physiol. 1960; 43(6)Suppl:129-75. PMC: 2195076. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.43.6.129. View

12.

Tsai H, Ewert J . Influence of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the response of visual neurons in toads (Bufo bufo L.). Brain Behav Evol. 1988; 32(1):27-38. DOI: 10.1159/000116530. View

13.

Nakayama K . Biological image motion processing: a review. Vision Res. 1985; 25(5):625-60. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90171-3. View

14.

Horridge G . The evolution of visual processing and the construction of seeing systems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1987; 230(1260):279-92. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1987.0020. View

15.

Frost B, Scilley P, Wong S . Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons. Exp Brain Res. 1981; 43(2):173-85. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237761. View

16.

Ewert J, Hock F . Movement-sensitive neurones in the toad's retina. Exp Brain Res. 1972; 16(1):41-59. DOI: 10.1007/BF00233373. View

17.

Regan D . Form from motion parallax and form from luminance contrast: vernier discrimination. Spat Vis. 1986; 1(4):305-18. DOI: 10.1163/156856886x00106. View

18.

Matsushima T, Satou M, Ueda K . Medullary reticular neurons in the Japanese toad: morphologies and excitatory inputs from the optic tectum. J Comp Physiol A. 1989; 166(1):7-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00190205. View

19.

Egelhaaf M, Hausen K, Reichardt W, WEHRHAHN C . Visual course control in flies relies on neuronal computation of object and background motion. Trends Neurosci. 1988; 11(8):351-8. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90057-4. View

20.

Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Saito H, Yukie M, Fukada Y, Iwai E . Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 1986; 6(1):134-44. PMC: 6568626. View