» Articles » PMID: 17950763

Practice Makes Perfect, but Only with the Right Hand: Sensitivity to Perceptual Illusions with Awkward Grasps Decreases with Practice in the Right but Not the Left Hand

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2007 Oct 24
PMID 17950763
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been proposed that the visual mechanisms that control well-calibrated actions, such as picking up a small object with a precision grip, are neurally distinct from those that mediate our perception of the object. Thus, grip aperture in such situations has been shown to be remarkably insensitive to many size-contrast illusions. But most of us have practiced such movements hundreds, if not thousands of times. What about less familiar and unpracticed movements? Perhaps they would be less likely to be controlled by specialized visuomotor mechanisms and would therefore be more sensitive to size-contrast illusions. To test this idea, we asked right-handed subjects to pick up small objects using either a normal precision grasp (thumb and index finger) or an awkward grasp (thumb and ring finger), in the context of the Ponzo illusion. Even though this size-contrast illusion had no effect on the scaling of the precision grasp, it did have a significant effect on the scaling of the awkward grasp. Nevertheless, after three consecutive days of practice, even the awkward grasp became resistant to the illusion. In a follow-up experiment, we found that awkward grasps with the left hand (in right handers) did not benefit from practice and remained sensitive to the illusion. We conclude that the skilled target-directed movements are controlled by visual mechanisms that are quite distinct from those controlling unskilled movements, and that these specialized visuomotor mechanisms may be lateralized to the left hemisphere.

Citing Articles

The BTPI: An online battery for measuring susceptibility to visual illusions.

Mazuz Y, Kessler Y, Ganel T J Vis. 2023; 23(10):2.

PMID: 37669069 PMC: 10484025. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.10.2.


Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot.

Liu Y, Caracoglia J, Sen S, Freud E, Striem-Amit E Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(6):1833-1848.

PMID: 35426511 PMC: 9142431. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06359-x.


Multivariate Analysis of Electrophysiological Signals Reveals the Time Course of Precision Grasps Programs: Evidence for Nonhierarchical Evolution of Grasp Control.

Guo L, Shamli Oghli Y, Frost A, Niemeier M J Neurosci. 2021; 41(44):9210-9222.

PMID: 34551938 PMC: 8570828. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0992-21.2021.


Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.

Ozana A, Berman S, Ganel T Front Psychol. 2020; 11:573352.

PMID: 33329216 PMC: 7710620. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573352.


A double dissociation between action and perception in bimanual grasping: evidence from the Ponzo and the Wundt-Jastrow illusions.

Ozana A, Ganel T Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):14665.

PMID: 32887921 PMC: 7473850. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71734-z.