» Articles » PMID: 17943358

The Laparoscopic Approach in Abdominal Emergencies: Has the Attitude Changed? : A Single-center Review of a 15-year Experience

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Oct 19
PMID 17943358
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopy has been practiced more and more in the management of abdominal emergencies. The aim of the present work was to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control 5-year experience of laparoscopic versus open surgery for abdominal emergencies carried out at our institution, especially with regard to whether our attitude toward use of this procedure has changed as compared with the beginning of our laparoscopic emergency experience (1991-2002).

Materials And Methods: From January 2002 to January 2007 a total of 670 patients underwent emergent and/or urgent laparoscopy (small bowel obstruction, 17; gastroduodenal ulcer disease, 16; biliary disease, 118; pelvic disease and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP), 512; colonic perforations, 7) at the hands of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy

Results: The conversion rate was 0.15%. Major complications ranged as high as 1.9% with no postoperative mortality. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 98.3% of the cases, and all such patients were treated successfully by laparoscopy.

Conclusions: We believe that laparoscopy is not an alternative to physical examination/good clinical judgment or to conventional noninvasive diagnostic methods in treating the patient with symptoms of an acute abdomen. However it must be considered an effective option in treating patients in whom these methods fail and as a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal emergencies.

Citing Articles

The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part I.

Sobocki J, Pedziwiatr M, Bigda J, Holowko W, Major P, Mitura K Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023; 18(2):187-212.

PMID: 37680734 PMC: 10481450. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.127877.


Liver Trauma: Until When We Have to Delay Surgery? A Review.

Garcia I, Santoyo Villalba J, Iovino D, Franchi C, Iori V, Pettinato G Life (Basel). 2022; 12(5).

PMID: 35629360 PMC: 9143295. DOI: 10.3390/life12050694.


Laparoscopy in Emergency: Why Not? Advantages of Laparoscopy in Major Emergency: A Review.

Ietto G, Amico F, Pettinato G, Iori V, Carcano G Life (Basel). 2021; 11(9).

PMID: 34575066 PMC: 8470929. DOI: 10.3390/life11090917.


An Overview of Gastroduodenal Perforation.

Weledji E Front Surg. 2020; 7:573901.

PMID: 33240923 PMC: 7680839. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901.


Estimation of the capacity of emergency surgery in Konya: Nine-year multicenter study.

Kucukkartallar T, Cakir M, Tekin A, Balasar M, Kartal A, Koksal H Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2017; 32(4):252-255.

PMID: 28149121 PMC: 5245716. DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2016.2797.


References
1.
Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer H, Cuschieri A . The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(7):1121-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9166-7. View

2.
Vons C . [Laparoscopy with a diagnostic aim in abdominal emergencies]. Chirurgie. 1999; 124(2):182-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4001(99)80063-4. View

3.
Scott H, Rosin R . The influence of diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy on patients presenting with an acute abdomen. J R Soc Med. 1993; 86(12):699-701. PMC: 1294359. DOI: 10.1177/014107689308601209. View

4.
Branicki F . Abdominal emergencies: diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2003; 3(3):269-82. DOI: 10.1089/109629602761624234. View

5.
Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L, Avinoach E, Mizrahi S . Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19(4):464-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9038-z. View