» Articles » PMID: 17941714

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies

Overview
Journal PLoS Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Oct 19
PMID 17941714
Citations 1814
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

Citing Articles

Determinants of weight gain in pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum in Dire Dawa administration, Eastern Ethiopia: An unmatched case-control study.

Derese Asfaw T, Manaye Y, Girma M Womens Health (Lond). 2025; 21:17455057251318193.

PMID: 40071992 PMC: 11905026. DOI: 10.1177/17455057251318193.


Reasons for using electronic cigarettes among young adults aged 18 - 30: a systematic review.

Kinouani S, Roux F, Questel B, Abraham M, Tzourio C EXCLI J. 2025; 24:204-237.

PMID: 40071024 PMC: 11895060. DOI: 10.17179/excli2024-8085.


Prevalence and clinical burden of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in contemporary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in US hospitals.

Bulut H, Maestre M, Tomey D J Orthop. 2025; 61:122-126.

PMID: 40051786 PMC: 11882337. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.006.


Variations in Prescribing Rates of End-of-Life Medications Among Long-Term Care Residents in Alberta Compared with Ontario-a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Simon J, Bhattarai A, Apoint-Hao Z, Roberts R, Milani C, Webber C Can Geriatr J. 2025; 28(1):31-40.

PMID: 40051597 PMC: 11882209. DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.811.


Exploring epidemiological risk factors for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Considerations for monoclonal antibody therapy in people with Alzheimer's disease.

Ma L, Wang Y, Huynh A, Amadoru S, Wrigley S, Yates P Alzheimers Dement. 2025; 21(3):e14602.

PMID: 40042470 PMC: 11881626. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14602.


References
1.
Pocock S, Collier T, Dandreo K, De Stavola B, Goldman M, Kalish L . Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice. BMJ. 2004; 329(7471):883. PMC: 523109. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38250.571088.55. View

2.
Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001; 357(9263):1191-4. View

3.
Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G . Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 1998; 316(7125):140-4. PMC: 2665367. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140. View

4.
Schriger D . Suggestions for improving the reporting of clinical research: the role of narrative. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45(4):437-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.09.022. View

5.
Lee W, Bindman J, Ford T, Glozier N, Moran P, Stewart R . Bias in psychiatric case-control studies: literature survey. Br J Psychiatry. 2007; 190:204-9. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.027250. View