Rational Selection of the Optimum MALDI Matrix for Top-down Proteomics by In-source Decay
Affiliations
In-source decay (ISD) in MALDI leads to c- and z-fragment ion series enhanced by hydrogen radical donors and is a useful method for sequencing purified peptides and proteins. Until now, most efforts to improve methods using ISD concerned instrumental optimization. The most widely used ISD matrix is 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB). We present here a rational way to select MALDI matrixes likely to enhance ISD for top-down proteomic approaches. Starting from Takayama's model (Takayama, M. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 1044-9), according to which formation of ISD fragments (c and z) would be due to a transfer of hydrogen radical from the matrix to the analyte, we evaluated the hydrogen-donating capacities of matrixes, and thus their ISD abilities, with spirooxazines (hydrogen scavengers). The determined hydrogen-donating abilities of the matrixes are ranked as follows: picolinic acid (PA) > 1,5-diaminonaphtalene (1,5-DAN) > DHB > sinapinic acid > alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid. The ISD enhancement obtained by using 1,5-DAN compared to DHB was confirmed with peptides and proteins. On that basis, a matrix-enhanced ISD approach was successfully applied to sequence peptides and proteins up to approximately 8 kDa. Although PA alone is not suitable for peptide and protein ionization, ISD signals could be further enhanced when PA was used as an additive to 1,5-DAN. The optimized matrix preparation was successfully applied to identify larger proteins by large ISD tag researches in protein databases (BLASTp). Coupled with an adequate separation method, ISD is a promising tool to include in a top-down proteomic strategy.
Parmar D, Rosado-Rosa J, Shrout J, Sweedler J Methods. 2024; 224:21-34.
PMID: 38295894 PMC: 11149699. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.01.014.
Takayama M Molecules. 2023; 28(23).
PMID: 38067431 PMC: 10708033. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28237700.
Toward a MALDI in-source decay (ISD) method for top-down analysis of protein footprinting.
Jiang R, Rempel D, Gross M Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester). 2023; 29(5-6):292-302.
PMID: 37750197 PMC: 11092977. DOI: 10.1177/14690667231202695.
Cruz Villarreal J, Kruithoff R, Egatz-Gomez A, Coleman P, Ros R, Sandrin T Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022; 414(13):3945-3958.
PMID: 35385983 PMC: 9188328. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-04038-y.
Methods for Proteomic Analyses of Mycobacteria.
Mehaffy C, Lucas M, Kruh-Garcia N, Dobos K Methods Mol Biol. 2021; 2314:533-548.
PMID: 34235669 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1460-0_23.