» Articles » PMID: 17934565

Prostate Biopsy: Current Status and Limitations

Overview
Journal Rev Urol
Date 2007 Oct 16
PMID 17934565
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The technique of prostate biopsy has evolved over the past 10 years to improve our ability to detect prostate cancer. Extended biopsy schemes can be performed in the office under local anesthesia and are well tolerated. In addition to detection, the role of extended biopsy schemes in refining tumor grading and risk assessment has become better defined. This review discusses the evolution of prostate biopsy techniques from the sextant scheme to the extended scheme and demonstrates the latter's utility in clinical decision making.

Citing Articles

Shape Manipulation of Bevel-Tip Needles for Prostate Biopsy Procedures: A Comparison of Two Resolved-Rate Controllers.

Wang Y, Al-Zogbi L, Liu J, Shepard L, Ghazi A, Tokuda J Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2025; 2024:1-7.

PMID: 40038963 PMC: 11884662. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10781867.


Understanding Spatial Correlation Between Multiparametric MRI Performance and Prostate Cancer.

Zabihollahy F, Naim S, Wibulpolprasert P, Reiter R, Raman S, Sung K J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024; 60(5):2184-2195.

PMID: 38345143 PMC: 11317542. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29287.


[MR-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy from Radiologists' Perspective].

Kim S, Park K J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023; 84(6):1220-1232.

PMID: 38107690 PMC: 10721410. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2023.0095.


The nexus of dynamic T cell states and immune checkpoint blockade therapy in the periphery and tumor microenvironment.

Luo H, Wang W, Mai J, Yin R, Cai X, Li Q Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1267918.

PMID: 37881432 PMC: 10597640. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267918.


Fully automated detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer on MR images using a cascaded convolutional neural network.

Zhu L, Gao G, Zhu Y, Han C, Liu X, Li D Front Oncol. 2022; 12:958065.

PMID: 36249048 PMC: 9558117. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.958065.


References
1.
Presti Jr J, Chang J, Bhargava V, Shinohara K . The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol. 1999; 163(1):163-6; discussion 166-7. View

2.
Fradet Y, Saad F, Aprikian A, Dessureault J, Elhilali M, Trudel C . uPM3, a new molecular urine test for the detection of prostate cancer. Urology. 2004; 64(2):311-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.052. View

3.
Freedland S, Kane C, Amling C, Aronson W, Terris M, Presti Jr J . Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications. Urology. 2007; 69(3):495-9. PMC: 3080253. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.036. View

4.
Hodge K, McNeal J, Terris M, Stamey T . Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989; 142(1):71-4; discussion 74-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38664-0. View

5.
Freedland S, Aronson W, Terris M, Kane C, Amling C, Dorey F . Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database. J Urol. 2003; 169(6):2136-41. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000065588.82511.06. View