» Articles » PMID: 17932912

QMEAN: A Comprehensive Scoring Function for Model Quality Assessment

Overview
Journal Proteins
Date 2007 Oct 13
PMID 17932912
Citations 392
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In protein structure prediction, a considerable number of alternative models are usually produced from which subsequently the final model has to be selected. Thus, a scoring function for the identification of the best model within an ensemble of alternative models is a key component of most protein structure prediction pipelines. QMEAN, which stands for Qualitative Model Energy ANalysis, is a composite scoring function describing the major geometrical aspects of protein structures. Five different structural descriptors are used. The local geometry is analyzed by a new kind of torsion angle potential over three consecutive amino acids. A secondary structure-specific distance-dependent pairwise residue-level potential is used to assess long-range interactions. A solvation potential describes the burial status of the residues. Two simple terms describing the agreement of predicted and calculated secondary structure and solvent accessibility, respectively, are also included. A variety of different implementations are investigated and several approaches to combine and optimize them are discussed. QMEAN was tested on several standard decoy sets including a molecular dynamics simulation decoy set as well as on a comprehensive data set of totally 22,420 models from server predictions for the 95 targets of CASP7. In a comparison to five well-established model quality assessment programs, QMEAN shows a statistically significant improvement over nearly all quality measures describing the ability of the scoring function to identify the native structure and to discriminate good from bad models. The three-residue torsion angle potential turned out to be very effective in recognizing the native fold.

Citing Articles

An Integrative Multitiered Computational Analysis for Better Understanding the Structure and Function of 85 Miniproteins.

Veluri R, Pollin G, Wagenknecht J, Urrutia R, Zimmermann M bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974886 PMC: 11838408. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.31.635936.


Reexamining the Mycovirome of spp.

Munoz-Suarez H, Ruiz-Padilla A, Donaire L, Benito E, Ayllon M Viruses. 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 39459972 PMC: 11512270. DOI: 10.3390/v16101640.


Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of and reveal the biosynthetic pathway from gigantol to erianin.

Xie L, Chen Q, Cheng N, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Zhang Y Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1436560.

PMID: 39391777 PMC: 11464314. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1436560.


Structural investigation, computational analysis, and theoretical cryoprotectant approach of antifreeze protein type IV mutants.

Eskandari A, Leow T, Rahman M, Oslan S Eur Biophys J. 2024; 53(7-8):385-403.

PMID: 39327310 DOI: 10.1007/s00249-024-01719-7.


Structural Characterization of Heat Shock Protein 90β and Molecular Interactions with Geldanamycin and Ritonavir: A Computational Study.

Lima C, Antunes D, Caffarena E, Carels N Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201468 PMC: 11354266. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168782.