» Articles » PMID: 17932160

Combined Resynchronisation and Implantable Defibrillator Therapy in Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Oct 13
PMID 17932160
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To review the evidence base from randomised controlled trials of combined cardiac resynchronisation therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in left ventricular impairment and symptomatic heart failure.

Design: Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Data Sources: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to June 2006.

Review Methods: Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and quality. Included trials compared cardiac resynchronisation therapy, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, combined resynchronisation and implantable defibrillator therapy, and medical therapy alone, in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function. Bayesian random effects network models were used to examine overall number of deaths.

Results: 12 studies including 1636 events in 8307 patients were identified. Combined cardiac resynchronisation and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy reduced the number of deaths by one third compared with medical therapy alone (odds ratio 0.57, 95% credible interval 0.40 to 0.80) but did not further improve survival when compared with implantable defibrillator therapy (0.82, 0.57 to 1.18) or resynchronisation (0.85, 0.60 to 1.22) therapy alone.

Conclusion: Evidence from randomised controlled trials is insufficient to show the superiority of combined cardiac resynchronisation and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy over cardiac resynchronisation therapy alone in patients with left ventricular impairment.

Citing Articles

Septal and Conduction System Pacing.

Katritsis D, Calkins H Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023; 12:e25.

PMID: 37860698 PMC: 10583155. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2023.14.


Nonischemic Super-Responders in Fusion CRT Pacing with Normal Atrioventricular Conduction.

Goanta E, Luca C, Vacarescu C, Crisan S, Petrescu L, Vatasescu R Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36140434 PMC: 9497644. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092032.


Effectiveness of interventions for the reversal of a metabolic syndrome diagnosis: An update of a meta-analysis of mixed treatment comparison studies.

Guzman A, Navarro E, Obando L, Pacheco J, Quiros K, Vasquez L Biomedica. 2019; 39(4):647-662.

PMID: 31860177 PMC: 7363343. DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.4684.


Should Primary Prevention ICDs Still Be Placed in Patients with Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy? A Review of the Evidence.

Ganga H, Maan A, Heist E Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018; 20(5):31.

PMID: 29574588 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-018-0974-y.


Role of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials.

Romero J, Chaudhary R, Garg J, Lupercio F, Shah N, Gupta R J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017; 49(3):263-270.

PMID: 28674918 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-017-0260-8.


References
1.
Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S, Block M, Vogt J, Bakker P . Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39(12):2026-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01895-8. View

2.
Normand S . Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. Stat Med. 1999; 18(3):321-59. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990215)18:3<321::aid-sim28>3.0.co;2-p. View

3.
Caldwell D, Ades A, Higgins J . Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ. 2005; 331(7521):897-900. PMC: 1255806. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7521.897. View

4.
Lu G, Ades A . Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004; 23(20):3105-24. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1875. View

5.
Sterne J, Egger M . Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54(10):1046-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8. View