» Articles » PMID: 17925853

Implementing Routine HIV Testing: the Role of State Law

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2007 Oct 11
PMID 17925853
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV testing for all Americans aged 13-64, which would eliminate requirements for written consent and pretest counseling as previously required. However, this approach may conflict with state requirements concerning pretest counseling and informed consent for HIV testing. Our survey of state HIV testing laws demonstrates that the majority of states have HIV testing requirements that are inconsistent with the CDC's recommendations. Moreover, states that have recently amended their laws have not eased the requirements for pretest counseling and informed consent. The reasons for the persistence of these legal requirements must be understood to effect policy changes to increase HIV testing.

Citing Articles

Effect of CDC 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations for Adults, Adolescents, Pregnant Women, and Newborns on State Laws, 2018.

Valentine S, Caldwell J, Tailor A Public Health Rep. 2020; 135(1_suppl):189S-196S.

PMID: 32735201 PMC: 7407059. DOI: 10.1177/0033354920930146.


Challenges in the delivery of public HIV testing and counselling (HTC) in Douala, Cameroon: providers perspectives and implications on quality of HTC services.

Ngangue P, Gagnon M, Bedard E BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017; 17(1):9.

PMID: 28390398 PMC: 5385024. DOI: 10.1186/s12914-017-0118-2.


Beliefs and attitudes of medical students from public and private universities in Malaysia towards individuals with HIV/AIDS.

Choy K, Rene T, Khan S ScientificWorldJournal. 2013; 2013:462826.

PMID: 24285935 PMC: 3830817. DOI: 10.1155/2013/462826.


Perspectives on the ethical concerns and justifications of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing: HIV screening policy changes.

Waxman M, Merchant R, Celada M, Clark M BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14:46.

PMID: 24219238 PMC: 3830113. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-46.


HIV testing in the nation's opioid treatment programs, 2005-2011: the role of state regulations.

DAunno T, Pollack H, Jiang L, Metsch L, Friedmann P Health Serv Res. 2013; 49(1):230-48.

PMID: 23855724 PMC: 3839251. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12094.


References
1.
. CDC to urge routine HIV tests for a broad swath of Americans. AIDS Read. 2006; 16(6):288. View

2.
Tobin K, Tang A, Gilbert S, Latkin C . Correlates of HIV antibody testing among a sample of injection drug users: the role of social and contextual factors. AIDS Behav. 2004; 8(3):303-10. DOI: 10.1023/B:AIBE.0000044077.66072.14. View

3.
Gostin L . HIV screening in health care settings: public health and civil liberties in conflict?. JAMA. 2006; 296(16):2023-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.16.2023. View

4.
Conyers L, Boomer K, McMahon B . Workplace discrimination and HIV/AIDS: the national EEOC ADA research project. Work. 2005; 25(1):37-48. View

5.
Paltiel A, Weinstein M, Kimmel A, Seage 3rd G, Losina E, Zhang H . Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(6):586-95. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa042088. View