Medical and Social Prognoses of Non-specific Building-related Symptoms (Sick Building Syndrome): a Follow-up Study of Patients Previously Referred to Hospital

Overview

Journal Int Arch Occup Environ Health

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2007 Oct 10

PMID 17924130

Citations 10

Authors

B Edvardsson

B Stenberg

J Bergdahl

N Eriksson

G Linden

L Widman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe and analyse the medical and social prognoses of patients with non-specific building-related symptoms.

Methods: A follow-up questionnaire focusing on current medical and social status, care, treatment, other actions taken and personality traits was sent to 239 patients with non-specific building-related symptoms assessed during the period between 1986 and 1998 at University Hospital in Umeå, Sweden. The response rate was 79%.

Results: Fatigue, irritation of the eyes, and facial erythema were the most common weekly symptoms reported at follow-up. As females constituted 92% of the respondents, statistical analyses were restricted to women. The level and severity of symptoms decreased over time, although nearly half of the patients claimed that symptoms were more or less unchanged after 7 years or more, despite actions taken. Twenty-five percent of the patients were on the sick-list, and 20% drew disability pension due to persistent symptoms at follow-up. The risk of having no work capabilities at follow-up was significantly increased if the time from onset to first visit at the hospital clinic was more than 1 year. This risk was also significantly higher if the patient at the first visit had five or more symptoms. All risk assessments were adjusted for length of follow-up. Symptoms were often aggravated by different situations in everyday life.

Conclusions: Long-lasting symptoms aggravated by environmental factors exist within this group of patients. The results support that early and comprehensive measures for rehabilitation are essential for the patients.

Citing Articles

The Continuum of Severity of Functional Impairment Due to Indoor Air Symptoms: Prevalence and Determinants.

Eidsto E, Selinheimo S, Lampi J, Salmela A, Pekkanen J J Occup Environ Med. 2023; 65(9):717-724.

PMID: 37231645 PMC: 10487355. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002884.

Skin sensitivity to capsaicin, perceived stress and burn out among patients with building-related symptoms.

Glas B, Claeson A Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021; 94(5):791-797.

PMID: 33423091 PMC: 8238921. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-020-01647-x.

Clinical Characteristics of Disability in Patients with Indoor Air-Related Environmental Intolerance.

Vuokko A, Karvala K, Suojalehto H, Lindholm H, Selinheimo S, Heinonen-Guzejev M Saf Health Work. 2019; 10(3):362-369.

PMID: 31497334 PMC: 6717934. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.003.

Association between Sick Building Syndrome and Indoor Environmental Quality in Slovenian Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kalender Smajlovic S, Kukec A, Dovjak M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(17).

PMID: 31484409 PMC: 6747401. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173224.

Psychological symptoms and self-image of patients with complaints attributed to dental restorative materials.

Marell L, Bergdahl J, Tillberg A, Stenberg B, Berglund A Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 23(6):2805-2811.

PMID: 30368660 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2707-4.

References

Ahman M, Lundin A, Musabasic V, Soderman E . Improved health after intervention in a school with moisture problems. Indoor Air. 2000; 10(1):57-62. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010001057.x. View

Eriksson N, Stenberg B . Baseline prevalence of symptoms related to indoor environment. Scand J Public Health. 2006; 34(4):387-96. DOI: 10.1080/14034940500228281. View

Pommer L, Fick J, Sundell J, Nilsson C, Sjostrom M, Stenberg B . Class separation of buildings with high and low prevalence of SBS by principal component analysis. Indoor Air. 2004; 14(1):16-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00203.x. View

Skyberg K, Skulberg K, Eduard W, Skaret E, Levy F, Kjuus H . Symptoms prevalence among office employees and associations to building characteristics. Indoor Air. 2003; 13(3):246-52. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2003.00190.x. View

Rudblad S, Andersson K, Stridh G, Bodin L, Juto J . Slowly decreasing mucosal hyperreactivity years after working in a school with moisture problems. Indoor Air. 2002; 12(2):138-44. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.01112.x. View

Stenberg B, Wall S . Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men?. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 40(4):491-502. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0104-z. View

Kipen H, Fiedler N . The role of environmental factors in medically unexplained symptoms and related syndromes: conference summary and recommendations. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110 Suppl 4:591-5. PMC: 1241210. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110s4591. View

Stenberg B, Eriksson N, Hoog J, Sundell J, Wall S . The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) in office workers. A case-referent study of personal, psychosocial and building-related risk indicators. Int J Epidemiol. 1994; 23(6):1190-7. DOI: 10.1093/ije/23.6.1190. View

Bourbeau J, Brisson C, Allaire S . Prevalence of the sick building syndrome symptoms in office workers before and six months and three years after being exposed to a building with an improved ventilation system. Occup Environ Med. 1997; 54(1):49-53. PMC: 1128635. DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.1.49. View

10.

Arnetz B . Model development and research vision for the future of multiple chemical sensitivity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000; 25(6):569-73. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.482. View

11.

Redlich C, Sparer J, Cullen M . Sick-building syndrome. Lancet. 1997; 349(9057):1013-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07220-0. View

12.

Menzies D, Bourbeau J . Building-related illnesses. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(21):1524-31. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199711203372107. View

13.

Apter A, Bracker A, Hodgson M, Sidman J, Leung W . Epidemiology of the sick building syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994; 94(2 Pt 2):277-88. View

14.

Stenberg B, Bergdahl J, Edvardsson B, Eriksson N, Linden G, Widman L . Medical and social prognosis for patients with perceived hypersensitivity to electricity and skin symptoms related to the use of visual display terminals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002; 28(5):349-57. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.685. View

15.

Brasche S, Bullinger M, Morfeld M, Gebhardt H, BISCHOF W . Why do women suffer from sick building syndrome more often than men?--subjective higher sensitivity versus objective causes. Indoor Air. 2002; 11(4):217-22. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.110402.x. View

16.

Norback D, Edling C . Environmental, occupational, and personal factors related to the prevalence of sick building syndrome in the general population. Br J Ind Med. 1991; 48(7):451-62. PMC: 1035398. DOI: 10.1136/oem.48.7.451. View

17.

Nethercott J, Davidoff L, Curbow B, Abbey H . Multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome: toward a working case definition. Arch Environ Health. 1993; 48(1):19-26. DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1993.9938389. View