» Articles » PMID: 17920934

Persistent Neural Activity During the Maintenance of Spatial Position in Working Memory

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2007 Oct 9
PMID 17920934
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mechanism for the short-term maintenance of information involves persistent neural activity during the retention interval, which forms a bridge between the cued memoranda and its later contingent response. Here, we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify cortical areas with activity that persists throughout working memory delays with the goal of testing if such activity represents visuospatial attention or prospective saccade goals. We did so by comparing two spatial working memory tasks. During a memory-guided saccade (MGS) task, a location was maintained during a delay after which a saccade was generated to the remembered location. During a spatial item recognition (SIR) task identical to MGS until after the delay, a button press indicated whether a newly cued location matched the remembered location. Activity in frontal and parietal areas persisted above baseline and was greater in the hemisphere contralateral to the cued visual field. However, delay-period activity did not differ between the tasks. Notably, in the putative frontal eye field (FEF), delay period activity did not differ despite that the precise metrics of the memory-guided saccade were known during the MGS delay and saccades were never made in SIR. Persistent FEF activity may therefore represent a prioritized attentional map of space, rather than the metrics for saccades.

Citing Articles

Prioritizing Working Memory Resources Depends on the Prefrontal Cortex.

Hallenbeck G, Tardiff N, Sprague T, Curtis C J Neurosci. 2025; 45(11).

PMID: 39870527 PMC: 11905361. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1552-24.2025.


Individual differences in spatial working memory strategies differentially reflected in the engagement of control and default brain networks.

Purg Suljic N, Kraljic A, Rahmati M, Cho Y, Slana Ozimic A, Murray J Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(8).

PMID: 39214852 PMC: 11364466. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae350.


Trying Harder: How Cognitive Effort Sculpts Neural Representations during Working Memory.

Master S, Li S, Curtis C J Neurosci. 2024; 44(28.

PMID: 38769009 PMC: 11236589. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0060-24.2024.


Neural mechanisms of resource allocation in working memory.

Li H, Sprague T, Yoo A, Ma W, Curtis C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38766258 PMC: 11100829. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.11.593695.


Cortical and white matter substrates supporting visuospatial working memory.

Ueda R, Sakakura K, Mitsuhashi T, Sonoda M, Firestone E, Kuroda N Clin Neurophysiol. 2024; 162:9-27.

PMID: 38552414 PMC: 11102300. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.03.008.


References
1.
Wang X . Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity. Trends Neurosci. 2001; 24(8):455-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01868-3. View

2.
Leung H, Gore J, Goldman-Rakic P . Sustained mnemonic response in the human middle frontal gyrus during on-line storage of spatial memoranda. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002; 14(4):659-71. DOI: 10.1162/08989290260045882. View

3.
Medendorp W, Goltz H, Vilis T . Directional selectivity of BOLD activity in human posterior parietal cortex for memory-guided double-step saccades. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 95(3):1645-55. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00905.2005. View

4.
Bruce C, Goldberg M . Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades. J Neurophysiol. 1985; 53(3):603-35. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.3.603. View

5.
Machens C, Romo R, Brody C . Flexible control of mutual inhibition: a neural model of two-interval discrimination. Science. 2005; 307(5712):1121-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1104171. View