» Articles » PMID: 17920109

Extracapsular Extension of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases is of Prognostic Value in Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri

Overview
Journal Gynecol Oncol
Date 2007 Oct 9
PMID 17920109
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Pelvic lymph node involvement is a well-recognized prognostic factor in cervical carcinoma (CX). Limited knowledge exists about extranodal extension of the tumor outside the lymph node capsule, i.e. extracapsular spread (ECS).

Methods: Two hundred fifty-six cases of surgically treated CX (FIGO stage IB1 to IIB) with pelvic lymph node involvement were evaluated regarding the occurrence of extranodal spread of the metastatic deposits outside the lymph node capsule (ECS), determined on standardized handled lymphadenectomy specimens, regarding their impact of recurrent disease and overall survival during a median follow-up time of 62 months (95% CI 51-73 months).

Results: ECS was seen in 30.9% (79/256) of the cases. The occurrence of ECS showed a significant correlation to advanced stage disease (p=0.02), the number of involved nodes (p<0.001) and the size of metastatic deposits (p<0.01). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate in patients with ECS was significant lower compared to patients without ECS (59.7% [95% CI: 46.3%-73.2%] versus 67.2% [95% CI: 58.9%-75.5%]; (p=0.04). The 5-year overall survival rate was significant lower in patients with ECS (33.5% [95% CI: 20.6%-46.3%] vs. 60.5% [95% CI: 52.3%-68.6%]; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor stage, number of involved pelvic nodes, tumor differentiation and ECS were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions: The results indicate that extracapsular spread (ECS) of pelvic lymph node metastases is of prognostic impact in cervical carcinomas. A revised FIGO/TNM classification system for pelvic lymph node disease is recommended: ECS 0 = lymph node involvement without extranodal spread of the metastatic deposits and ECS 1 = lymph node involvement with extranodal spread of the metastatic deposits.

Citing Articles

HPV-driven cancer: from epidemiology to the HPV-driven tumor board proposal, everything you wanted to know but were afraid to ask.

Alterio D, Gola M, Zaffaroni M, Vincini M, Cattaneo C, Aristei C Clin Transl Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 40048019 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-03868-3.


Should all cervical cancer patients with positive lymph node receive definitive radiotherapy: a population-based comparative study.

Wang Y, Liu X, Liu J, Liu L, Ma Y Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; 311(1):123-134.

PMID: 39751823 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07896-2.


Partial omentectomy maybe practicable for T3 or shallower gastric cancer patients.

Lin Q, Bai Q, Huang Q, Huang Y, Gao J, Zhang Y Cancer Med. 2022; 12(2):1204-1216.

PMID: 35856487 PMC: 9883580. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4980.


Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern.

Dhamija E, Baby A, Bhatla N, Pulappadi V, Kumar M, Kumar S Indian J Med Res. 2022; 154(2):383-390.

PMID: 35295016 PMC: 9131760. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_212_21.


Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Staging of Cervical Cancer-Analysis of Patients from the Prospective Study on Total Mesometrial Resection.

Stukan M, Buderath P, Szulczynski B, Gebicki J, Kimmig R Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34679447 PMC: 8534714. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101749.