» Articles » PMID: 17901134

Imaging Artifacts of Medical Instruments in Ultrasound-guided Interventions

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 29
PMID 17901134
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Real-time 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging has the potential to become a dominant imaging technique for minimally invasive surgery. One barrier to its widespread use is that surgical instruments generate imaging artifacts, which can obfuscate their location, orientation, and geometry and obscure nearby tissue. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the types of artifacts which could be produced by metallic instruments during interventions guided by 3D ultrasound imaging.

Methods: Three imaging studies were performed. First, imaging artifacts from stainless steel rods were identified in vitro and acoustically characterized. Second, 3 typical minimally invasive instruments were imaged (in vitro and in vivo), and their artifacts were analyzed. The third study compared the intensity of imaging artifacts (in vitro and in vivo) from stainless steel rods with rods composed of 3 different materials and stainless steel rods with roughened and coated surfaces.

Results: For the stainless steel rods, all observed artifacts are described and illustrated, and their physical origins are explained. Artifacts from the 3 minimally invasive instruments are characterized with the use of the artifacts observed with the rods. Finally, it is shown that artifacts can be greatly reduced through the use of alternate materials or by surface modification.

Conclusions: Instrument artifacts in 3D ultrasound images can be more confusing than those from the same instruments imaged in 2 dimensions. Real-time 3D ultrasound imaging can, however, be used effectively for in vivo imaging of minimally invasive instruments by using artifact mitigation techniques, including careful selection of probe and incision locations, as well as by instrument modification.

Citing Articles

3D ultrasound guidance for radiofrequency ablation in an anthropomorphic thyroid nodule phantom.

Boers T, Braak S, Brink W, Versluis M, Manohar S Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):115.

PMID: 39400616 PMC: 11473505. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00513-6.


Comparison of Franseen and novel tricore needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in a porcine liver model.

Park Y, Kang J, Kim J, Won D, Ryu D, Kim S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22453.

PMID: 39341878 PMC: 11439050. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73184-3.


In vivo photoacoustic imaging of major blood vessels in the pancreas and liver during surgery.

Kempski K, Wiacek A, Graham M, Gonzalez E, Goodson B, Allman D J Biomed Opt. 2019; 24(12):1-12.

PMID: 31411010 PMC: 7006046. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.121905.


Optically-guided instrument for transapical beating-heart delivery of artificial mitral chordae tendineae.

Machaidze Z, Mencattelli M, Arnal G, Price K, Wu F, Weixler V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 158(5):1332-1340.

PMID: 31005306 PMC: 6754808. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.120.


Strategy for Monitoring Cardiac Interventions with an Intelligent Robotic Ultrasound Device.

Wang S, Housden J, Zar A, Gandecha R, Singh D, Rhode K Micromachines (Basel). 2018; 9(2).

PMID: 30393341 PMC: 6187734. DOI: 10.3390/mi9020065.