» Articles » PMID: 17900795

Characterization of Cysts Using Differential Correlation Coefficient Values from Two Dimensional Breast Elastography: Preliminary Study

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2007 Sep 29
PMID 17900795
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although simple cysts are easily identified using sonography, description and management of nonsimple cysts remains uncertain. This study evaluated whether the correlation coefficient differences between breast tissue and lesions, obtained from 2D breast elastography, could potentially distinguish nonsimple cysts from cancers and fibroadenomas. We hypothesized that correlation coefficients in cysts would be dramatically lower than surrounding tissue because noise, imaging artifacts, and particulate matter move randomly and decorrelate quickly under compression, compared with solid tissue. For this preliminary study, 18 breast lesions (7 nonsimple cysts, 4 cancers, and 7 fibroadenomas) underwent imaging with 2D elastography at 7.5 MHz through a TPX (a polymethyl pentene copolymer) 2.5 mm mammographic paddle. Breasts were compressed similar to mammographic positioning and then further compressed for elastography by 1 to 7%. Images were correlated using 2D phase-sensitive speckle tracking algorithms and displacement estimates were accumulated. Correlation coefficient means and standard deviations were measured in the lesion and adjacent tissue, and the differential correlation coefficient (DCC) was introduced as the difference between these values normalized to the correlation coefficient of adjacent tissue. Mean DCC values in nonsimple cysts were 24.2 +/- 11.6%, 5.7 +/- 6.3% for fibroadenomas, and 3.8 +/- 2.9 % for cancers (p < 0.05). Some of the cysts appeared smaller in DCC images than gray-scale images. These encouraging results demonstrate that characterization of nonsimple breast cysts may be improved by using DCC values from 2D elastography, which could potentially change management options of these cysts from intervention to imaging follow-up. A dedicated clinical trial to fully assess the efficacy of this technique is recommended.

Citing Articles

Deep learning and ultrasound feature fusion model predicts the malignancy of complex cystic and solid breast nodules with color Doppler images.

Liu H, Hou C, Tang J, Sun L, Lu K, Liu Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):10500.

PMID: 37380667 PMC: 10307806. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37319-2.


Coherence Metrics for Reader-Independent Differentiation of Cystic From Solid Breast Masses in Ultrasound Images.

Wiacek A, Oluyemi E, Myers K, Ambinder E, Bell M Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022; 49(1):256-268.

PMID: 36333154 PMC: 9712258. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.08.018.


Performance Study of a Torsional Wave Sensor and Cervical Tissue Characterization.

Callejas A, Gomez A, Melchor J, Riveiro M, Masso P, Torres J Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(9).

PMID: 28891995 PMC: 5621116. DOI: 10.3390/s17092078.


Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification: value in malignancy prediction for complex cystic and solid breast lesions.

Zhang Y, Zhao C, Li X, He Y, Ren W, Zou C Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):7807.

PMID: 28798325 PMC: 5552809. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07865-7.


[Elastography as an additional tool in breast sonography. Technical principles and clinical applications].

Rjosk-Dendorfer D, Reichelt A, Clevert D Radiologe. 2014; 54(3):211-6.

PMID: 24570107 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-013-2575-5.


References
1.
Crystal P, Strano S, Shcharynski S, Koretz M . Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181(1):177-82. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.1.1810177. View

2.
Rubin J, Xie H, Kim K, Weitzel W, Emelianov S, Aglyamov S . Sonographic elasticity imaging of acute and chronic deep venous thrombosis in humans. J Ultrasound Med. 2006; 25(9):1179-86. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.9.1179. View

3.
Kaluzynski K, Chen X, Emelianov S, Skovoroda A, ODonnell M . Strain rate imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2001; 48(4):1111-23. DOI: 10.1109/58.935730. View

4.
Sinha S, Goodsitt M, Roubidoux M, Booi R, LeCarpentier G, Lashbrook C . Automated ultrasound scanning on a dual-modality breast imaging system: coverage and motion issues and solutions. J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26(5):645-55. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.5.645. View

5.
Janssen J, Schlorer E, Greiner L . EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65(7):971-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.057. View