» Articles » PMID: 17897269

A Comparison of Parents and Pediatric Anesthesiologists' Preferences for Attributes of Child Daycase Surgery: a Discrete Choice Experiment

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 28
PMID 17897269
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Currently, there is little evidence relating to which attributes of pediatric daycase surgery are most important to parents; therefore, it is difficult for policy-makers in the UK to incorporate parents' preferences into pediatric daycase service provision. Additionally, few studies have considered anesthesiologists' preferences in this area. Parents and anesthesiologists' preferences for perioperative care of children undergoing daycase surgery may differ and this could affect levels of satisfaction with service provision. This study aimed to elicit and compare the relative importance of attributes of pediatric daycase surgery provision to parents and anesthesiologists using an established stated preference method, the discrete choice experiment. The attributes considered were: parental involvement in medical decision making; parental presence at induction of anaesthesia; quality of recovery from anaesthesia; staff attitude; postoperative pain and cost to the parents.

Methods: A postal questionnaire including a discrete choice experiment was sent to (a) parents whose children had been admitted to hospital under a surgical consultant (n = 280) and (b) anesthesiologists who are resident in the UK and are members of the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists (n = 193).

Results: All six attributes studied were statistically significant to both respondent groups, indicating that all attributes were important to respondents. The strength of anesthesiologists and parents' preferences was significantly different for all attributes other than parental presence at induction of anaesthesia.

Conclusions: Parents and anesthesiologists had a significantly different order of priorities for service attributes.

Citing Articles

Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.

Wright S, Vass C, Sim G, Burton M, Fiebig D, Payne K Patient. 2018; 11(5):475-488.

PMID: 29492903 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-018-0304-x.


Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.

Harrison M, Milbers K, Hudson M, Bansback N BMJ Open. 2017; 7(5):e014719.

PMID: 28515194 PMC: 5623426. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014719.


The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.

Vass C, Rigby D, Payne K Med Decis Making. 2017; 37(3):298-313.

PMID: 28061040 PMC: 5367554. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X16683934.


Prioritising wheelchair services for children: a pilot discrete choice experiment to understand how child wheelchair users and their parents prioritise different attributes of wheelchair services.

Bray N, Yeo S, Noyes J, Harris N, Tudor Edwards R Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016; 2:32.

PMID: 27965851 PMC: 5154007. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0074-y.


Parents' preferences for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.

Hofman R, de Bekker-Grob E, Raat H, Helmerhorst T, van Ballegooijen M, Korfage I BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:454.

PMID: 24885861 PMC: 4047770. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-454.