» Articles » PMID: 17896370

Improved Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC)-MR Perfusion Estimates by Motion Correction

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 27
PMID 17896370
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of patient motion on quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps in ischemic stroke patients and to evaluate the efficacy of a motion-correction scheme.

Materials And Methods: Perfusion data from 25 ischemic stroke patients were selected for analysis. Two motion profiles were applied to a digital anthropomorphic brain phantom to estimate accuracy. CBF images were generated for motion-corrupted and motion-corrected data. To correct for motion, rigid-body registration was performed. The realignment parameters and mean CBF in regions of interest were recorded.

Results: All patient data with motion exhibited visibly reduced intervolume misalignment after motion correction. Improved flow delineation between different tissues and a more clearly defined ischemic lesion (IL) were achieved in the motion-corrected CBF. A significant difference occurred in the IL (P < 0.05) for patients with severe motion with an average difference between corrupted and corrected data of 4.8 mL/minute/100 g. The phantom data supported the patient results with better CBF accuracy after motion correction and high registration accuracy (<1 mm translational and <1 degrees rotational error).

Conclusion: Motion degrades flow differentiation between adjacent tissues in CBF maps and can cause ischemic severity to be underestimated. A registration motion correction scheme improves dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MR perfusion estimates.

Citing Articles

Optimising MR perfusion imaging: comparison of different software-based approaches in acute ischaemic stroke.

Schaafs L, Porter D, Audebert H, Fiebach J, Villringer K Eur Radiol. 2016; 26(11):4204-4212.

PMID: 26852218 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4244-3.


ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain.

Welker K, Boxerman J, Kalnin A, Kaufmann T, Shiroishi M, Wintermark M AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36(6):E41-51.

PMID: 25907520 PMC: 5074767. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4341.


Automated vs manual delineations of regions of interest- a comparison in commercially available perfusion MRI software.

Galinovic I, Ostwaldt A, Soemmer C, Bros H, Hotter B, Brunecker P BMC Med Imaging. 2012; 12:16.

PMID: 22809148 PMC: 3423015. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-16.


Deconvolution-Based CT and MR Brain Perfusion Measurement: Theoretical Model Revisited and Practical Implementation Details.

Fieselmann A, Kowarschik M, Ganguly A, Hornegger J, Fahrig R Int J Biomed Imaging. 2011; 2011:467563.

PMID: 21904538 PMC: 3166726. DOI: 10.1155/2011/467563.