» Articles » PMID: 17888838

Coronary Revascularization in the Community. A Population-based Study, 1990 to 2004

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 25
PMID 17888838
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We sought to examine temporal trends in the utilization of coronary revascularization in a geographically defined population.

Background: Earlier reports on revascularization utilization focused on inpatient settings and did not distinguish incident from recurrent procedures. Furthermore, little is known on age- and gender-specific trends. Finally, longitudinal data on the utilization and results of coronary angiography as explanatory factors for the changing revascularization practice are lacking.

Methods: Data integrating diagnostic and therapeutic coronary procedures performed in Olmsted County (Minnesota) between 1990 and 2004 were analyzed. Standardized rates were calculated applying the direct method and temporal trends compared using Poisson regression models.

Results: Revascularization utilization increased by 24% during the study (95% confidence interval [CI] 5% to 46%), but the trends diverged by procedure type, with a sustained increase (69%, 95% CI 43% to 101%) for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) contrasting with a stabilization, then decline (-33%, 95% CI -16% to -47%) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). For PCI, although the use increased in all categories, greater increases were noted in the elderly, in women, and for recurrent procedures. No such patterns were detected for CABG. Angiography use remained stable, and the rate of 3-vessel and/or left main disease declined (-22%, 95% CI -8% to -33%).

Conclusions: Over the 15-year period, revascularization increased in the community with a large increase in PCI partially offset by a decrease in CABG. More PCIs are performed in women and the elderly and for recurrent disease. These changes occurred within the context of a decline in multivessel disease and thus likely reflect the natural history of coronary artery disease.

Citing Articles

Drug-coated balloon-only strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo left main coronary artery disease: the importance of proper lesion preparation.

Uskela S, Eranti A, Karkkainen J, Rissanen T Front Med. 2022; 17(1):75-84.

PMID: 36562952 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-022-0950-1.


Coronary Disease Surveillance in the Community: Angiography and Revascularization.

Gerber Y, Gibbons R, Weston S, Fabbri M, Herrmann J, Manemann S J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(7):e015231.

PMID: 32237975 PMC: 7428619. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015231.


Descriptive Study on the Korean Status of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) Database: Focused on Temporal Trend.

Sung J, Hong K Korean Circ J. 2019; 49(12):1155-1163.

PMID: 31456371 PMC: 6875599. DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0080.


Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk.

Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, Angiolillo D, Byrne R, Capodanno D Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(31):2632-2653.

PMID: 31116395 PMC: 6736433. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz372.


Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, Angiolillo D, Byrne R, Capodanno D Circulation. 2019; 140(3):240-261.

PMID: 31116032 PMC: 6636810. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167.