» Articles » PMID: 17879034

Predictors of Successful Salvage Surgery for Local Pelvic Recurrence of Rectosigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancers

Overview
Journal Surg Today
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2007 Sep 20
PMID 17879034
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the predictors of successful resection of recurrent tumors and improved survival in patients with local pelvic recurrence of rectosigmoid colon and rectal cancer.

Methods: We analyzed the clinicopathological factors of 94 patients who underwent treatment between 1993 and 2002 for the local pelvic recurrence of curatively resected primary rectosigmoid colon and rectal adenocarcinoma.

Results: Of the 94 patients, 48 underwent salvage surgery and 46 were treated conservatively. The survival rate of the patients who underwent salvage surgery was significantly higher than that of those treated conservatively (P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the following factors were significantly associated with successful salvage surgery: tumor differentiation (well or moderately; P < 0.04), a long interval between the initial operation and the detection of recurrence (P < 0.03), and negative lymph node status at the initial operation (P < 0.02). The Cox proportional hazard model revealed the following predictors of better survival after surgery: tumor differentiation (well and moderate), negative lymph node status at the initial operation (pN0), and a perianastomotic pattern of recurrence.

Conclusion: The predictors of successful salvage surgery are the tumor differentiation and nodal status of the primary tumor, the interval between the initial operation and the detection of recurrence, and the pattern of tumor recurrence.

Citing Articles

State-of-the-art surgery for recurrent and locally advanced rectal cancers.

Kazi M, Sukumar V, DeSouza A, Saklani A Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021; 406(6):1763-1774.

PMID: 34341869 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02285-8.


Clinical review: surgical management of locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

Courtney D, McDermott F, Heeney A, Winter D Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013; 399(1):33-40.

PMID: 24249035 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1134-x.


A phase I trial of S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Wada H, Nemoto K, Nomiya T, Murakami M, Suzuki M, Kuroda Y Int J Clin Oncol. 2012; 18(2):273-8.

PMID: 22318782 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-012-0375-y.


Pelvic exenteration for advanced and recurrent malignancy.

Zoucas E, Frederiksen S, Lydrup M, Mansson W, Gustafson P, Alberius P World J Surg. 2010; 34(9):2177-84.

PMID: 20512493 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0637-7.


Cost-effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Mobaraki A, Ohno T, Yamada S, Sakurai H, Nakano T Cancer Sci. 2010; 101(8):1834-9.

PMID: 20500516 PMC: 11159752. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01604.x.

References
1.
Rubbini M, Vettorello G, Guerrera C, Mari C, De Anna D, Mascoli F . A prospective study of local recurrence after resection and low stapled anastomosis in 183 patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990; 33(2):117-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02055539. View

2.
McDermott F, Hughes E, Pihl E, Johnson W, Price A . Local recurrence after potentially curative resection for rectal cancer in a series of 1008 patients. Br J Surg. 1985; 72(1):34-7. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720115. View

3.
Phillips R, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry J, Fielding L . Local recurrence following 'curative' surgery for large bowel cancer: II. The rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg. 1984; 71(1):17-20. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800710105. View

4.
Olson R, Perencevich N, Malcolm A, Chaffey J, Wilson R . Patterns of recurrence following curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 1980; 45(12):2969-74. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800615)45:12<2969::aid-cncr2820451214>3.0.co;2-7. View

5.
Rosen L, VEIDENHEIMER M, Coller J, Corman M . Mortality, morbidity, and patterns of recurrence after abdominoperineal resection for cancer of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982; 25(3):202-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02553101. View