» Articles » PMID: 17877799

A Framework for Significance Analysis of Gene Expression Data Using Dimension Reduction Methods

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Sep 20
PMID 17877799
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The most popular methods for significance analysis on microarray data are well suited to find genes differentially expressed across predefined categories. However, identification of features that correlate with continuous dependent variables is more difficult using these methods, and long lists of significant genes returned are not easily probed for co-regulations and dependencies. Dimension reduction methods are much used in the microarray literature for classification or for obtaining low-dimensional representations of data sets. These methods have an additional interpretation strength that is often not fully exploited when expression data are analysed. In addition, significance analysis may be performed directly on the model parameters to find genes that are important for any number of categorical or continuous responses. We introduce a general scheme for analysis of expression data that combines significance testing with the interpretative advantages of the dimension reduction methods. This approach is applicable both for explorative analysis and for classification and regression problems.

Results: Three public data sets are analysed. One is used for classification, one contains spiked-in transcripts of known concentrations, and one represents a regression problem with several measured responses. Model-based significance analysis is performed using a modified version of Hotelling's T2-test, and a false discovery rate significance level is estimated by resampling. Our results show that underlying biological phenomena and unknown relationships in the data can be detected by a simple visual interpretation of the model parameters. It is also found that measured phenotypic responses may model the expression data more accurately than if the design-parameters are used as input. For the classification data, our method finds much the same genes as the standard methods, in addition to some extra which are shown to be biologically relevant. The list of spiked-in genes is also reproduced with high accuracy.

Conclusion: The dimension reduction methods are versatile tools that may also be used for significance testing. Visual inspection of model components is useful for interpretation, and the methodology is the same whether the goal is classification, prediction of responses, feature selection or exploration of a data set. The presented framework is conceptually and algorithmically simple, and a Matlab toolbox (Mathworks Inc, USA) is supplemented.

Citing Articles

Identifying anti-TNF response biomarkers in ulcerative colitis using a diffusion-based signalling model.

Singh A, Anderssen E, Fenton C, Paulssen R Bioinform Adv. 2023; 1(1):vbab017.

PMID: 36700114 PMC: 9710619. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbab017.


Benchmark study of feature selection strategies for multi-omics data.

Li Y, Mansmann U, Du S, Hornung R BMC Bioinformatics. 2022; 23(1):412.

PMID: 36199022 PMC: 9533501. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-04962-x.


Robust Wavelength Selection Using Filter-Wrapper Method and Input Scaling on Near Infrared Spectral Data.

Silalahi D, Midi H, Arasan J, Mustafa M, Caliman J Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(17).

PMID: 32899292 PMC: 7506801. DOI: 10.3390/s20175001.


Comparison of Bi- and Tri-Linear PLS Models for Variable Selection in Metabolomic Time-Series Experiments.

Gao Q, Dragsted L, Ebbels T Metabolites. 2019; 9(5).

PMID: 31075899 PMC: 6571821. DOI: 10.3390/metabo9050092.


Transcription profiling during the cell cycle shows that a subset of Polycomb-targeted genes is upregulated during DNA replication.

Pena-Diaz J, Hegre S, Anderssen E, Aas P, Mjelle R, Gilfillan G Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(5):2846-56.

PMID: 23325852 PMC: 3597645. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1336.


References
1.
Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G, Brown P, Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2001; 17(6):520-5. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520. View

2.
Yang Y, Buckley M, Speed T . Analysis of cDNA microarray images. Brief Bioinform. 2002; 2(4):341-9. DOI: 10.1093/bib/2.4.341. View

3.
Kopinski P, Przybylsk G, Balicka-Slusarczyk B, Jarzemska A, Dyczek A, Pinis G . [Apoptosis of alveolar lymphocytes in sarcoidosis and in control group is more frequent in smokers than in nonsmoking persons]. Przegl Lek. 2007; 63(10):841-7. View

4.
Nguyen D, Rocke D . Multi-class cancer classification via partial least squares with gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18(9):1216-26. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.9.1216. View

5.
Lo K, Gottardo R . Flexible empirical Bayes models for differential gene expression. Bioinformatics. 2006; 23(3):328-35. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl612. View