» Articles » PMID: 17876673

Surgery for Rectal Cancer Performed at Teaching Hospitals Improves Survival and Preserves Continence

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2007 Sep 19
PMID 17876673
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We sought to compare the outcomes of teaching and community hospitals on long-term outcomes for patients with rectal cancer. All rectal adenocarcinomas treated in Florida from 1994 to 2000 were examined. Overall, 5,925 operative cases were identified. Teaching hospitals treated 12.5% of patients with a larger proportion of regionally advanced, metastatic disease, as well as high-grade tumors. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates at teaching hospitals were 64.8 and 53.9%, compared to 59.1 and 50.5% at community hospitals (P = 0.002). The greatest impact on survival was observed for the highest stage tumors: patients with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma experienced 5- and 10-year survival rates of 30.5 and 26.6% at teaching hospitals compared to 19.6 and 17.4% at community hospitals (P = 0.009). Multimodality therapy was most frequently administered in teaching hospitals as was low anterior resection. On multivariate analysis, treatment at a teaching hospital was a significant independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.834, P = 0.005). Rectal cancer patients treated at teaching hospitals have significantly better survival than those treated at community-based hospitals. Patients with high-grade tumors or advanced disease should be provided the opportunity to be treated at a teaching hospital.

Citing Articles

Association of Teaching Status and Mortality After Cancer Surgery.

Lam M, Riley K, Mehtsun W, Phelan J, Orav E, Jha A Ann Surg Open. 2021; 2(3).

PMID: 34458890 PMC: 8389472. DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000073.


Effect of academic status on outcomes of surgery for rectal cancer.

Cagino K, Altieri M, Yang J, Nie L, Talamini M, Spaniolas K Surg Endosc. 2017; 32(6):2774-2780.

PMID: 29218672 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5977-z.


Improving quality of cancer care at community hospitals: impact of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program pilot.

Halpern M, Spain P, Holden D, Stewart A, McNamara E, Gay G J Oncol Pract. 2013; 9(6):e298-304.

PMID: 23943902 PMC: 5812352. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000937.


Analysis of super-low anterior resection for rectal cancer from a single center.

Han S, Shen X, Zeng Q, Guo S, Cheng J, Zhu G J Gastrointest Cancer. 2010; 41(3):159-64.

PMID: 20155335 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-010-9131-6.


Will patients benefit from regionalization of gynecologic cancer care?.

Brookfield K, Cheung M, Yang R, Byrne M, Koniaris L PLoS One. 2009; 4(1):e4049.

PMID: 19125205 PMC: 2612742. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004049.


References
1.
Christian C, Gustafson M, Betensky R, Daley J, Zinner M . The volume-outcome relationship: don't believe everything you see. World J Surg. 2005; 29(10):1241-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7993-8. View

2.
Fleshman J, Myerson R . Adjuvant radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Surg Clin North Am. 1997; 77(1):15-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70530-2. View

3.
Hannan E, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan M . The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery. 2002; 131(1):6-15. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.120238. View

4.
Gordon T, BOWMAN H, Bass E, Lillemoe K, Yeo C, Heitmiller R . Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 189(1):46-56. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00072-1. View

5.
Riley G, Lubitz J . Outcomes of surgery among the Medicare aged: surgical volume and mortality. Health Care Financ Rev. 1986; 7(1):37-47. PMC: 4191511. View