» Articles » PMID: 17872880

Are Patients with Hyperlipidemia Undertreated? Study of Patients Admitted to Hospital with Coronary Events

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 18
PMID 17872880
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify patients admitted to hospital with coronary events and to estimate their pre-admission coronary risk, including their lipid levels. Despite the available data and numerous guidelines, evidence indicates that many patients with hyperlipidemia are undertreated and are not achieving target lipid levels.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Acute care community hospital in Winnipeg, Man.

Participants: A total of 153 patients who were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or acute coronary syndrome upon admission.

Method: Each patient's 10-year risk of developing coronary artery disease was calculated, and his or her risk status was established. Each patient's low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were recorded and categorized based on current Canadian guidelines.

Results: Mean age of patients was 67.6 years; 60.8% were male. Patients in the low-risk category had a mean LDL-C level of 2.98 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.66 to 3.29), and patients in the moderate-risk category had a mean LDL-C level of 3.01 mmol/L (95% CI 2.74 to 3.28), both significantly lower (P < .05) than the LDL-C target levels for patients in those risk categories according to Canadian guidelines. The mean LDL-C level for patients in the very high-risk category, however, was 2.53 mmol/L (95% CI 2.35 to 2.71), above the recommended goal. Almost half the patients (48.3%) in the very high-risk category had LDL-C levels that exceeded the goal. Slightly more than 1 in 3 patients in the very high-risk category was reported to be taking lipid-lowering agents.

Conclusion: Patients in the community who are at very high risk of having cardiovascular events are undertreated with respect to attaining LDL-C target levels. These findings point to an opportunity to prevent patient morbidity and reduce the number of hospitalizations for cardiovascular events.

References
1.
Pitt B, Waters D, Brown W, van Boven A, Schwartz L, Title L . Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(2):70-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199907083410202. View

2.
. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(19):1349-57. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199811053391902. View

3.
Majumdar S, Gurwitz J, Soumerai S . Undertreatment of hyperlipidemia in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 14(12):711-7. PMC: 1496865. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.02229.x. View

4.
PEARSON T, Laurora I, Chu H, Kafonek S . The lipid treatment assessment project (L-TAP): a multicenter survey to evaluate the percentages of dyslipidemic patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy and achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160(4):459-67. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.4.459. View

5.
Fodor J, Frohlich J, Genest Jr J, McPherson P . Recommendations for the management and treatment of dyslipidemia. Report of the Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias. CMAJ. 2000; 162(10):1441-7. PMC: 1232457. View