» Articles » PMID: 17867951

Determination of Ideal Stent Length for Endourologic Surgery

Overview
Journal J Endourol
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2007 Sep 18
PMID 17867951
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess whether direct measurement of ureteral length correlates with patient height or the ureteral length measured on intravenous urography in order to determine the appropriate ureteral stent length to be used for ureteroscopic surgery.

Patients And Methods: Sixty-five patients (70 ureters) who underwent ureteroscopic procedures were evaluated. The ureteral length between the ureteropelvic and ureterovesical junctions was determined either by preoperative intravenous urography (straight ureteral length; SUL) or intraoperatively with the aid of a guidewire (practical ureteral length; PUL). We regarded the PUL as a clinically useful measurement. The height, SUL, and PUL for each patient was determined. For a postoperative comparison of proper stent position, we selected another 36 patients in whom the length of the stent was based on patient height.

Results: The SUL values correlated significantly with the PUL (R2 = 0.482 on the right v 0.564 on the left side) and might be used as a predictor of stent length. However, patient height did not correlate with the PUL. Postoperative stent position tended to be better in the patients who had direct ureteral measurements than in those with stents chosen on the basis of patient height.

Conclusion: Determination of stent length according to patient height does not correlate well with the length needed for endoscopic procedures. Direct measurement of the ureteral length is easy and minimizes stent-associated complications and stent migration.

Citing Articles

Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons.

Kwong J, Honey R, Lee J, Ordon M Cent European J Urol. 2023; 76(1):57-63.

PMID: 37064265 PMC: 10091891. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.83.


Korean ureter length: A computed tomography-based study.

Jung S, Park H, Yu M, Kim Y, Lee H, Choi W Investig Clin Urol. 2020; 61(3):291-296.

PMID: 32377605 PMC: 7189102. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.3.291.


Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents.

Taguchi M, Yoshida K, Sugi M, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T Int Braz J Urol. 2018; 44(6):1224-1233.

PMID: 30516929 PMC: 6442190. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0620.


A ureteral stent crossing the bladder midline leads to worse urinary symptoms.

Taguchi M, Yoshida K, Sugi M, Matsuda T, Kinoshita H Cent European J Urol. 2018; 70(4):412-417.

PMID: 29410895 PMC: 5791404. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1533.


Verification of relationships between anthropometric variables among ureteral stents recipients and ureteric lengths: a challenge for Vitruvian-da Vinci theory.

Acelam P Res Rep Urol. 2015; 7:117-24.

PMID: 26317082 PMC: 4540172. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S87860.