» Articles » PMID: 17855670

Idraparinux Versus Standard Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Sep 15
PMID 17855670
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism is treated with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by a vitamin K antagonist. We investigated the potential use of idraparinux, a long-acting inhibitor of activated factor X, as a substitute for standard therapy.

Methods: We conducted two randomized, open-label noninferiority trials involving 2904 patients with deep-vein thrombosis and 2215 patients with pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of idraparinux versus standard therapy. Patients received either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg once weekly) or a heparin followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist for either 3 or 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the 3-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (nonfatal or fatal).

Results: In the study of patients with deep venous thrombosis, the incidence of recurrence at day 92 was 2.9% in the idraparinux group as compared with 3.0% in the standard-therapy group (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.50), a result that satisfied the prespecified noninferiority requirement. At 6 months, the hazard ratio for idraparinux was 1.01. The rates of clinically relevant bleeding at day 92 were 4.5% in the idraparinux group and 7.0% in the standard-therapy group (P=0.004). At 6 months, bleeding rates were similar. In the study of patients with pulmonary embolism, the incidence of recurrence at day 92 was 3.4% in the idraparinux group and 1.6% in the standard-therapy group (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.21 to 3.78), a finding that did not meet the noninferiority requirement.

Conclusions: In patients with deep venous thrombosis, once-weekly subcutaneous idraparinux for 3 or 6 months had an efficacy similar to that of heparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. However, in patients with pulmonary embolism, idraparinux was less efficacious than standard therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00067093 [ClinicalTrials.gov] and NCT00062803 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Citing Articles

Rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs. dual antiplatelet therapy in endovascular treatment in peripheral artery disease and analysis of medication utilization of different lesioned vascular regions.

Huo S, Cheng J Front Surg. 2023; 10:1285553.

PMID: 38026492 PMC: 10665835. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1285553.


Prognostication of Patients with Pulmonary Thromboembolism with and without Residual Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Subanalysis of the J'xactly Study.

Yamada N, Fukuda I, Nakamura M, Takayama M, Maeda H, Yamashita T Ann Vasc Dis. 2023; 16(3):181-188.

PMID: 37779650 PMC: 10539124. DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.22-00111.


Rivaroxaban treatment for asymptomatic venous thromboembolism: insights from the J'xactly study.

Migita S, Okumura Y, Fukuda I, Nakamura M, Yamada N, Takayama M Thromb J. 2023; 21(1):88.

PMID: 37599351 PMC: 10440934. DOI: 10.1186/s12959-023-00528-w.


Clinical trial assessing the safety of edoxaban with concomitant chemotherapy in patients with gynecological cancer-associated thrombosis (EGCAT study).

Oride T, Sawada K, Shimizu A, Kinose Y, Takiuchi T, Kodama M Thromb J. 2023; 21(1):57.

PMID: 37183245 PMC: 10184411. DOI: 10.1186/s12959-023-00500-8.


Duration of Initial Intensive Rivaroxaban Therapy for Patients With Venous Thromboembolism - Subanalysis of the J'xactly Study.

Nakamura M, Fukuda I, Yamada N, Takayama M, Maeda H, Yamashita T Circ Rep. 2023; 5(4):144-151.

PMID: 37025939 PMC: 10072900. DOI: 10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0008.