» Articles » PMID: 17852284

The Everyday Memory Questionnaire-revised: Development of a 13-item Scale

Overview
Journal Disabil Rehabil
Date 2007 Sep 14
PMID 17852284
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The Everyday Memory Questionnaire (EMQ) was developed as a subjective measure of memory failure in everyday life. Previous studies have investigated the factor structure of the EMQ in both healthy participants and people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the present study was to confirm the factor structure of the EMQ, to determine the internal consistency and criterion validity of the scale and to develop a shortened version.

Method: A retrospective design, including participants from a study on MS patients and their carers and a study on stroke patients. Psychometric properties of the EMQ-28 were explored, and the measure was further revised from comparative analyses between the clinical and non-clinical groups.

Results: Reliability and factor analysis of the EMQ-28 identified two main factors, general memory and attentional function, showing some concordance with previous research. Further analysis reduced the questionnaire to a 13-item measure (EMQ-R), with two main factors (Retrieval and Attentional tracking), strong internal reliability, and good discriminatory properties between clinical and control groups.

Conclusions: The 28-item questionnaire consistently differentiated between two broad systems of memory and attention, with some differentiation of visual and verbal, or language systems. Results showed some consistency with previous findings. The revised, 13-item questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool that has good face validity for use with neurological patients. Further exploration of the revised EMQ is recommended to provide information regarding its psychometric and clinical properties.

Citing Articles

Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Patients With Cognitive-Communication Disorders: A Survey Study.

Stagge F, Cohen M, Johnson A, Lanzi A Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025; 34(2):798-817.

PMID: 40029736 PMC: 11902987. DOI: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00285.


Perceived memory credibility: The role of details.

Nadel L, Simon K Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(52):e2416373121.

PMID: 39700147 PMC: 11670110. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2416373121.


Patient-Reported Factors Impacting Memory and Cognition Among Women Currently or Previously Receiving Treatment for Breast Cancer.

Reens H, Cotter E, Eckardt A Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72135.

PMID: 39575020 PMC: 11580820. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72135.


Distinction of papillary and adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: Clinical features, surgical nuances and hypothalamic outcomes.

Yang L, Liu Y, Wang C, Feng Z, Yu L, Pan J Neoplasia. 2024; 57:101060.

PMID: 39357265 PMC: 11474188. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2024.101060.


A cluster-randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating the Cognitive Occupation-Based programme for people with Multiple Sclerosis (COB-MS).

Hynes S, Dwyer C, Alvarez-Iglesias A, Rogers F, Joyce R, Oglesby M Neurol Sci. 2024; 46(1):445-462.

PMID: 39313688 PMC: 11698819. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07757-5.