» Articles » PMID: 17851666

Dual-source Computed Tomography in Patients with Acute Chest Pain: Feasibility and Image Quality

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2007 Sep 14
PMID 17851666
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and image quality of dual-source computed tomography angiography (DSCTA) in patients with acute chest pain for the assessment of the lung, thoracic aorta, and for pulmonary and coronary arteries. Sixty consecutive patients (32 female, 28 male, mean age 58.1+/-16.3 years) with acute chest pain underwent contrast-enhanced electrocardiography-gated DSCTA without prior beta-blocker administration. Vessel attenuation of different thoracic vascular territories was measured, and image quality was semi-quantitatively analyzed by two independent readers. Image quality of the thoracic aorta was diagnostic in all 60 patients, image quality of pulmonary arteries was diagnostic in 59, and image quality of coronary arteries was diagnostic in 58 patients. Pairwise intraindividual comparisons of attenuation values were small and ranged between 1+/-6 HU comparing right and left coronary artery and 56+/-9 HU comparing the pulmonary trunk and left ventricle. Mean attenuation was 291+/-65 HU in the ascending aorta, 334+/-93 HU in the pulmonary trunk, and 285+/-66 HU and 268+/-67 HU in the right and left coronary artery, respectively. DSCTA is feasible and provides diagnostic image quality of the thoracic aorta, pulmonary and coronary arteries in patients with acute chest pain.

Citing Articles

Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size.

Takx R, Krissak R, Fink C, Bachmann V, Henzler T, Meyer M Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(6):2292-2297.

PMID: 27686566 PMC: 5408040. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4607-9.


Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: high-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT.

De Zordo T, von Lutterotti K, Dejaco C, Soegner P, Frank R, Aigner F Eur Radiol. 2011; 22(2):279-86.

PMID: 21874569 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2251-y.


Low-dose triple-rule-out using 320-row-detector volume MDCT--less contrast medium and lower radiation exposure.

Durmus T, Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Muhler M, Hamm B, Hein P Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(7):1416-23.

PMID: 21347640 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2088-4.


Current Concepts in Cardiac CT Angiography for Patients With Acute Chest Pain.

Yoo S, Rho J, Lee H, Song I, Moon J, White C Korean Circ J. 2011; 40(11):543-9.

PMID: 21217929 PMC: 3008823. DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2010.40.11.543.


High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the aortic valve-aortic root complex without ECG-synchronization.

Karlo C, Leschka S, Goetti R, Feuchtner G, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(1):205-12.

PMID: 20677006 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1907-3.


References
1.
Hoffmann U, Pena A, Moselewski F, Ferencik M, Abbara S, Cury R . MDCT in early triage of patients with acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(5):1240-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.2240. View

2.
dAgostino A, Remy-Jardin M, Khalil C, Delannoy-Deken V, Flohr T, Duhamel A . Low-dose ECG-gated 64-slices helical CT angiography of the chest: evaluation of image quality in 105 patients. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(10):2137-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0218-1. View

3.
Hoffmann U, Nagurney J, Moselewski F, Pena A, Ferencik M, Chae C . Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation. 2006; 114(21):2251-60. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.634808. View

4.
Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O . Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(12):2739-47. PMC: 1705545. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0474-0. View

5.
Johnson T, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger B, Knez A, Boekstegers P, Reiser M . ECG-gated 64-MDCT angiography in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 188(1):76-82. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1153. View