» Articles » PMID: 17848194

Factors Considered by Medical Students when Formulating Their Specialty Preferences in Japan: Findings from a Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2007 Sep 13
PMID 17848194
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Little research addresses how medical students develop their choice of specialty training in Japan. The purpose of this research was to elucidate factors considered by Japanese medical students when formulating their specialty choice.

Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 25 Japanese medical students regarding factors influencing specialty preference and their views on roles of primary versus specialty care. We qualitatively analyzed the data to identify factors students consider when developing specialty preferences, to understand their views about primary and subspecialty care, and to construct models depicting the pathways to specialization.

Results: Students mention factors such as illness in self or close others, respect for family member in the profession, preclinical experiences in the curriculum such as labs and dissection, and aspects of patient care such as the clinical atmosphere, charismatic role models, and doctor-patient communication as influential on their specialty preferences. Participating students could generally distinguish between subspecialty care and primary care, but not primary care and family medicine. Our analysis yields a "Two Career" model depicting how medical graduates can first train for hospital-based specialty practice, and then switch to mixed primary/specialty care outpatient practice years later without any requirement for systematic training in principles of primary care practice.

Conclusion: Preclinical and clinical experiences as well as role models are reported by Japanese students as influential factors when formulating their specialty preferences. Student understanding of family medicine as a discipline is low in Japan. Students with ultimate aspirations to practice outpatient primary care medicine do not need to commit to systematic primary care training after graduation. The Two Career model of specialization leaves the door open for medical graduates to enter primary care practice at anytime regardless of post-graduate residency training choice.

Citing Articles

Geriatrics as a specialty: Insights from Mexican medical students' decision-making process.

Gomez-Moreno C, Vives-Varela T, Gulias-Herrero A, Avila-Funes J, Perez-Mendez A, Sanchez-Mendiola M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0315096.

PMID: 39951406 PMC: 11828400. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315096.


Scope of practice of Japanese primary care physicians and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study.

Higuchi T, Nakamura M, Ojima T, Inoue M Fam Med Community Health. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39900377 PMC: 11795410. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2024-003191.


Factors influencing choice of residency program among medical intern doctors and medical students: a cross-sectional survey.

Al Ajmi A, Kashoub M, Al-Busaidi I, Al Rashdi M, AlHussaini M, Alsaidi A BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):28.

PMID: 39773450 PMC: 11707892. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06576-8.


Intracurricular Factors Influencing Medical Students' Specialty Choice: A Systematic Review.

Schoon B, Kotter T Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024; 15:1127-1140.

PMID: 39620065 PMC: 11605303. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S491008.


Exploring challenges and perceptions in the learning environment: an online qualitative study of medical students.

Almansour M, Almoayad F BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):147.

PMID: 38355507 PMC: 10868022. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05116-8.


References
1.
Geyman J, Bliss E . What does family practice need to do next? A cross-generational view. Fam Med. 2001; 33(4):259-67. View

2.
Teo A . The current state of medical education in Japan: a system under reform. Med Educ. 2007; 41(3):302-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02691.x. View

3.
Senf J, Campos-Outcalt D, Kutob R . Factors related to the choice of family medicine: a reassessment and literature review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004; 16(6):502-12. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.16.6.502. View

4.
Apker J, Eggly S . Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: considering the ideological discourse of morning report. Qual Health Res. 2004; 14(3):411-29. DOI: 10.1177/1049732303260577. View

5.
Wright B, Scott I, Woloschuk W, Brenneis F, Bradley J . Career choice of new medical students at three Canadian universities: family medicine versus specialty medicine. CMAJ. 2004; 170(13):1920-4. PMC: 421719. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1031111. View