» Articles » PMID: 17846304

Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-eluting Stents for Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

Background: Advances in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents have dramatically improved results of these procedures. The optimal treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is uncertain given the lack of prospective, randomized data reflecting current practice. This study represents a "real-world" evaluation of current technology in the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease.

Methods And Results: A total of 1680 patients undergoing revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease were identified. Of these, 1080 patients were treated for 2-vessel disease (196 CABG and 884 PCI) and 600 for 3-vessel disease (505 CABG and 95 PCI). One-year mortality, cerebrovascular events, Q-wave myocardial infarction, target vessel failure, and composite major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were compared between the CABG and PCI cohorts. Outcomes were adjusted for baseline covariates and reported as hazard ratios. The unadjusted major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rate was reduced with CABG for patients with 2-vessel disease (9.7% CABG versus 21.2% PCI; P<0.001) and 3-vessel disease (10.8% CABG versus 28.4% PCI; P<0.001). Adjusted outcomes showed increased major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event with PCI for patients with 2-vessel (hazard ratio 2.29; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.76; P=0.01) and 3-vessel disease (hazard ratio 2.90; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.78; P<0.001). Adjusted outcomes for the nondiabetic subpopulation demonstrated equivalent major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event with PCI for 2-vessel (hazard ratio 1.77; 95% CI 0.96 to 3.25; P=0.07) and 3-vessel disease (hazard ratio 1.70; 95% CI 0.77 to 3.61; P=0.19).

Conclusions: Compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents, CABG resulted in improved major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event in patients with 2- and 3-vessel coronary artery disease, primarily in those with underlying diabetes. Coronary artery bypass surgery may be the preferred revascularization strategy in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Citing Articles

Late Clinical Outcomes of Total Arterial Revascularization or Multiple Arterial Grafting Compared to Conventional Single Arterial with Saphenous Vein Grafting for Coronary Surgery.

Ren J, Royse C, Royse A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37048600 PMC: 10094905. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072516.


Repeat Revascularization Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Traditional Sternotomy Techniques in 1468 Cases.

Olson P, Cinelli M, Rahming H, Vazzana T, Spagnola J, Barsoum E Cureus. 2022; 14(6):e25687.

PMID: 35812562 PMC: 9259080. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25687.


Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Li Y, Hou X, Liu T, Xu S, Huang Z, Xu X Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:802181.

PMID: 35433853 PMC: 9010548. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.802181.


Comparing clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention in real world practice in Iranian population.

Arabi A, Naghshtabrizi B, Baradaran H, Moradi Y, Asadi-Lari M, Mehrakizadeh A BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22(1):75.

PMID: 35240990 PMC: 8895790. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02521-z.


Monocyte-to-albumin ratio as a novel predictor of long-term adverse outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Zhang Z, Guo Q, Tang J, Zhang J, Cheng M, Song F Biosci Rep. 2021; 41(7).

PMID: 34137842 PMC: 8243340. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20210154.