Raffan R, Mann D, Savelsbergh G
Sports Med Open. 2024; 10(1):73.
PMID: 38861037
PMC: 11166615.
DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00730-8.
Zhao C, Liu N, Li S
PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0293436.
PMID: 38723019
PMC: 11081344.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293436.
Zhao C, Li S, Zhao X
PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16607.
PMID: 38099305
PMC: 10720415.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16607.
Rosker J, Majcen Rosker Z
Front Psychol. 2021; 12:689378.
PMID: 34616330
PMC: 8488081.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689378.
Li Y, Feng T
PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227521.
PMID: 31905223
PMC: 6944359.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227521.
Information Accrual From the Period Preceding Racket-Ball Contact for Tennis Ground Strokes: Inferences From Stochastic Masking.
Jalali S, Martin S, Ghose T, Buscombe R, Solomon J, Yarrow K
Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1969.
PMID: 31507503
PMC: 6718709.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01969.
Classification Videos Reveal the Visual Information Driving Complex Real-World Speeded Decisions.
Jalali S, Martin S, Murphy C, Solomon J, Yarrow K
Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2229.
PMID: 30524338
PMC: 6256113.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02229.
Stepovers and Signal Detection: Response Sensitivity and Bias in the Differentiation of Genuine and Deceptive Football Actions.
Jackson R, Barton H, Ashford K, Abernethy B
Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2043.
PMID: 30420821
PMC: 6215843.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02043.
Can Slow-Motion Footage of Forehand Strokes Be Used to Immediately Improve Anticipatory Judgments in Tennis?.
Fukuhara K, Maruyama T, Ida H, Ogata T, Sato B, Ishii M
Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1830.
PMID: 30337895
PMC: 6180172.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01830.
Returning Serve in Tennis: A Qualitative Examination of the Interaction of Anticipatory Information Sources Used by Professional Tennis Players.
Vernon G, Farrow D, Reid M
Front Psychol. 2018; 9:895.
PMID: 29951013
PMC: 6008562.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00895.
The role of proximal body information on anticipatory judgment in tennis using graphical information richness.
Fukuhara K, Ida H, Ogata T, Ishii M, Higuchi T
PLoS One. 2017; 12(7):e0180985.
PMID: 28704485
PMC: 5509252.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180985.
Cue Utilization and Cognitive Load in Novel Task Performance.
Brouwers S, Wiggins M, Helton W, OHare D, Griffin B
Front Psychol. 2016; 7:435.
PMID: 27064669
PMC: 4809880.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00435.
Can biological motion research provide insight on how to reduce friendly fire incidents?.
Steel K, Baxter D, Dogramaci S, Cobley S, Ellem E
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016; 23(5):1429-1439.
PMID: 26850024
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1006-9.
Intention understanding over T: a neuroimaging study on shared representations and tennis return predictions.
Cacioppo S, Fontang F, Patel N, Decety J, Monteleone G, Cacioppo J
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:781.
PMID: 25339886
PMC: 4186286.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00781.
Brain regions concerned with the identification of deceptive soccer moves by higher-skilled and lower-skilled players.
Wright M, Bishop D, Jackson R, Abernethy B
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 7:851.
PMID: 24381549
PMC: 3865769.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00851.
When less is more: reduced usefulness training for the learning of anticipation skill in tennis.
Smeeton N, Huys R, Jacobs D
PLoS One. 2013; 8(11):e79811.
PMID: 24244564
PMC: 3823585.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079811.
Recognition of tennis serve performed by a digital player: comparison among polygon, shadow, and stick-figure models.
Ida H, Fukuhara K, Ishii M
PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e33879.
PMID: 22439009
PMC: 3306305.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033879.