Folk Taxonomies and Biological Classification
Authors
Affiliations
A sample of 200 native plant names from the Tzeltal-speaking municipio of Tenejapa, Chiapas, Mexico, was found to consist of 41 percent that comprised more than one botanical species, 34 percent with a one-to-one correspondence, and 25 percent that referred to only a part of a botanical species. Cultural significance was least for the plants in the first group, greatest for those in the last group. Over half (60 percent) of the names for which there was one-to-one correspondence were plants associated with Hispanic culture, introduced as named entities following the Spanish conquest.
Philosophy without natural kinds: a reply to Reydon & Ereshefsky.
Ludwig D Eur J Philos Sci. 2024; 14(3):37.
PMID: 39076826 PMC: 11283435. DOI: 10.1007/s13194-024-00594-5.
Are we romanticizing traditional knowledge? A plea for more experimental studies in ethnobiology.
Leonti M J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024; 20(1):56.
PMID: 38797828 PMC: 11128107. DOI: 10.1186/s13002-024-00697-6.
Cropping synonymy: varietal standardization in the United States, 1900-1970.
Brown T Hist Philos Life Sci. 2023; 45(3):33.
PMID: 37436519 PMC: 10338580. DOI: 10.1007/s40656-023-00574-7.
Addi Y, Zhang Y, Ding X, Guo C, Wang Y J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022; 18(1):18.
PMID: 35292043 PMC: 8925061. DOI: 10.1186/s13002-022-00504-0.
Relationship of taxonomic error to frequency of observation.
Stribling J, Leppo E PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0241933.
PMID: 33180842 PMC: 7660486. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241933.