» Articles » PMID: 17805560

Role of the Reverse-Trendelenberg Patient Position in Maintaining Low-CVP Anaesthesia During Liver Resections

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2007 Sep 7
PMID 17805560
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: The Trendelenberg position is recommended during liver resection, to decrease the risk of venous air embolism. However, this position raises the central venous pressure and may increase blood loss. We propose that the reverse-Trendelenberg position can be safely and effectively used to maintain a low central venous pressure during liver surgery.

Materials And Methods: Fifty consecutive patients underwent elective liver resection at a single centre during a 17-month period. Patients were positioned with a head-up tilt during division of the liver parenchyma.

Results: Patients had a mean central venous pressure of 9.2 mmHg when supine, despite fluid restriction. The central venous pressure fell consistently and rapidly when they were tilted head-up, to a mean of 1.7 mmHg. The resections were completed with a median operative blood loss of 600 mL. No patient developed a clinically apparent venous air embolism. Postoperative renal dysfunction that could be attributed to low central venous pressure anaesthesia occurred in only one case.

Conclusion: The reverse-Trendelenberg position effectively lowers the CVP during liver surgery. It is easy to monitor, titrate and reverse, and avoids the need for complex pharmacological interventions. We recommend this position to liver surgeons and anaesthetists who have found it difficult to maintain a low CVP with the supine or Trendelenberg positions.

Citing Articles

Measuring intraoperative anesthetic parameters during hepatectomy with inferior vena cava clamping.

Nanashima A, Hiyoshi M, Imamura N, Hamada T, Tsuchimochi Y, Shimizu I Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):455.

PMID: 38049533 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03172-0.


Randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy to improve the quality of surgical field of hypotensive anesthesia with clonidine or dexmedetomidine during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Escamilla Y, Cardesin A, Samara L, Lopez S, Izquierdo A, Fradera M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 276(11):3095-3104.

PMID: 31363901 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05575-6.


[Central venous pressure in liver surgery : A primary therapeutic goal or a hemodynamic tessera?].

Behem C, Grassler M, Trepte C Anaesthesist. 2018; 67(10):780-789.

PMID: 30203329 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-018-0482-x.


Second Generation of a Fast-track Liver Resection Programme.

Schultz N, Larsen P, Klarskov B, Plum L, Frederiksen H, Kehlet H World J Surg. 2018; 42(6):1860-1866.

PMID: 29302723 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4399-3.


The influence of PEEP and positioning on central venous pressure and venous hepatic hemodynamics in patients undergoing liver resection.

Ukere A, Meisner S, Greiwe G, Opitz B, Benten D, Nashan B J Clin Monit Comput. 2016; 31(6):1221-1228.

PMID: 28012012 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9970-1.


References
1.
Jones R, Moulton C, Hardy K . Central venous pressure and its effect on blood loss during liver resection. Br J Surg. 1998; 85(8):1058-60. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00795.x. View

2.
Chui A, Moultan C, Lau W . Trendelenburg patient positioning: a reevaluation. J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 190(6):760-1. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00324-0. View

3.
Hatano Y, Murakawa M, Segawa H, Nishida Y, Mori K . Venous air embolism during hepatic resection. Anesthesiology. 1990; 73(6):1282-5. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199012000-00036. View

4.
Rees M, Plant G, Wells J, Bygrave S . One hundred and fifty hepatic resections: evolution of technique towards bloodless surgery. Br J Surg. 1996; 83(11):1526-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800831110. View

5.
Blumgart L, Baer H, Czerniak A, Zimmermann A, Dennison A . Extended left hepatectomy: technical aspects of an evolving procedure. Br J Surg. 1993; 80(7):903-6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800800735. View