» Articles » PMID: 17768185

Removal of Painful Orthopaedic Implants After Fracture Union

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 5
PMID 17768185
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Persistent pain in the region of implanted hardware following fracture fixation commonly leads to implant removal. This prospective study evaluated patient outcomes and pain reduction following removal of orthopaedic hardware implanted for fracture fixation.

Methods: Sixty patients who had been treated previously for a fracture and complained of pain in the region of the fracture fixation hardware constituted the study cohort. Patients were carefully examined by the treating physician to rule out other causes of pain such as infection and nonunion. Baseline data were recorded preoperatively. Data obtained postoperatively at three, six, and twelve months included a visual analog pain scale score and results on the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36. At the one-year interval, a patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed and outcomes were analyzed.

Results: There were no complications associated with implant removal surgery. Three patients did not have complete follow-up, leaving a total of fifty-seven patients with complete follow-up. At one year, all patients indicated that they were satisfied, that they would have the procedure done again, and that their overall function had improved. The scores for pain on the visual analog scale decreased from a mean (and standard deviation) of 5.5 +/- 2.5 before hardware removal to 1.3 +/- 1.8 after hardware removal, with an overall improvement at one year of 76% (p = 0.00001). At one year, thirty (53%) of the fifty-seven patients had complete resolution of pain. In addition, the results on the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire showed a 43% improvement from baseline (p = 0.0001), and the results on the physical component of the Short Form-36 showed a similar improvement of 40% (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions: Following fracture-healing, removal of hardware is safe with minimal risk. Improvement in pain relief and function can be expected.

Citing Articles

Percutaneous removal of hardware after orthopedic surgery: Is it safe? and What are patients saying?.

Page B, Sheridan G, Greenstein M, Reif T, Fragomen A, Rozbruch S Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(6):3135-3143.

PMID: 38981919 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04038-x.


Patient satisfaction after elective implant removal of the lower extremity - a retrospective cohort study.

Hambrecht J, Canal C, Klingebiel F, Kohli P, Neuhaus V, Pape H Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(3):1165-1172.

PMID: 38319352 PMC: 11249532. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02462-6.


Magnesium-based alloys with adapted interfaces for bone implants and tissue engineering.

Antoniac I, Manescu Paltanea V, Antoniac A, Paltanea G Regen Biomater. 2023; 10:rbad095.

PMID: 38020233 PMC: 10664085. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbad095.


Management of comminuted patellar fractures using suture reduction technique combined with the modified Kirschner-wire tension band.

Huang S, Zou C, Kenmegne G, Yin Y, Lin Y, Fang Y BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):251.

PMID: 37612690 PMC: 10464332. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02153-w.


Rates and Factors Associated With Hardware Removal in Physeal Ankle Fractures: Analysis of the Pediatric Health Information System.

Pearce R, Cazzulino A, Swarup I Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023; 8(2):24730114231182396.

PMID: 37425339 PMC: 10328018. DOI: 10.1177/24730114231182396.