» Articles » PMID: 17762924

Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) for Nasopharynx Cancer with Helical Tomotherapy. A Planning Study

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2007 Sep 1
PMID 17762924
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To explore the potential of helical tomotherapy (HT) in the treatment of nasopharynx cancer.

Patients And Methods: Six T1-4 N1-3 patients were considered. A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique was planned with inversely optimized conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; dynamic multileaf collimator using the Eclipse-Helios Varian system) and HT. The prescribed (median) doses were 54 Gy, 61.5 Gy, and 64.5 Gy delivered in 30 fractions to PTV1 (planning target volume), PTV2, and PTV3, respectively. The same constraints for PTV coverage and for parotids, spinal cord, mandible, optic structures, and brain stem were followed in both modalities. The planner also tried to reduce the dose to other structures (mucosae outside PTV1, larynx, esophagus, inner ear, thyroid, brain, lungs, submental connective tissue, bony structures) as much as possible.

Results: The fraction of PTV receiving >95% of the prescribed dose (V95%) increased from 97.6% and 94.3% (IMRT) to 99.6% and 97% (HT) for PTV1 and PTV3, respectively (p<0.05); median dose to parotids decreased from 30.1 Gy for IMRT to 25.0 Gy for HT (p<0.05). Significant gains (p<0.05) were found for most organs at risk (OARs): mucosae (V30 decreased from 44 cm(3) [IMRT] to 18 cm(3) [HT]); larynx (V30: 25 cm(3) vs. 11 cm(3)); thyroid (mean dose: 48.7 Gy vs. 41.5 Gy); esophagus (V45: 4 cm(3) vs. 1 cm(3)); brain stem (D1%: 45.1 Gy vs. 37.7 Gy).

Conclusion: HT improves the homogeneity of dose distribution within PTV and PTV coverage together with a significantly greater sparing of OARs compared to linac five-field IMRT.

Citing Articles

Optimum delineation of skin structure for dose calculation with the linear Boltzmann transport equation algorithm in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Hamada K, Fujibuchi T, Arakawa H Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 17(4):938-946.

PMID: 39249637 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00840-8.


The top 100 most cited articles in helical tomotherapy: a scoping review.

Zhang Y, Rong L, Wang Z, Zhao H Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1274290.

PMID: 37916164 PMC: 10616822. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1274290.


Comparison of Dosimetric Benefits of Three Precise Radiotherapy Techniques in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Using a Priority-Classified Plan Optimization Model.

Wang Q, Qin J, Cao R, Xu T, Yan J, Zhu S Front Oncol. 2021; 11:646584.

PMID: 34646757 PMC: 8504456. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646584.


Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography scans.

Branchini M, Broggi S, DellOca I, Cattaneo G, Calandrino R, Di Muzio N Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 8:44-50.

PMID: 33458416 PMC: 7807680. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.11.008.


Unilateral cochlea sparing in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: a planning study.

Braun L, Braun K, Frey B, Wolpert S, Lowenheim H, Zips D Strahlenther Onkol. 2018; 194(12):1124-1131.

PMID: 30109361 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1344-9.