» Articles » PMID: 17762000

Patients' Experiences of Screening for Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective Qualitative Study Embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Sep 1
PMID 17762000
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To provide insight into factors that contribute to the anxiety reported in a quantitative study of the psychological effect of screening for type 2 diabetes. To explore expectations of and reactions to the screening experience of patients with positive, negative, and intermediate results.

Design: Prospective qualitative interview study of patients attending a screening programme for type 2 diabetes.

Setting: Seven general practices in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial in the east of England.

Participants: 23 participants (aged 50-69) attending different stages in the screening process.

Results: Participants' perceptions changed as they progressed through the screening programme; the stepwise process seemed to help them adjust psychologically. The first screening test was typically considered unimportant and was attended with no thought about its implications. By the final diagnostic test, type 2 diabetes was considered a strong possibility, albeit a "mild" form. After diagnosis, people with screen detected type 2 diabetes tended to downplay its importance and talked confidently about their plans to control it. Participants with intermediate results seemed uncertain about their diagnosis, and those who screened negative were largely unaware of their remaining high risk.

Conclusions: This study helps in understanding the limited psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes quantified previously, in particular by the quantitative substudy of ADDITION (Cambridge). The findings have implications for implementing such a screening programme in terms of timing and content.

Citing Articles

Preventive health examinations: protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study of German employees aged 45 to 59 years (Ü45-check).

Kalski L, Greiss F, Hartung J, Hafermann L, Hofmann M, Wolfarth B Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1076565.

PMID: 37377547 PMC: 10291684. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1076565.


How Did People with Prediabetes Who Attended the Diabetes Prevention Education Program (DiPEP) Experience Making Lifestyle Changes? A Qualitative Study in Nepal.

Shakya P, Bajracharya M, Skovlund E, Shrestha A, Karmacharya B, Kulseng B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(6).

PMID: 36981962 PMC: 10048900. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20065054.


Placing assistive technology and telecare in everyday practices of people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from an embedded ethnography of a national dementia trial.

Lariviere M, Poland F, Woolham J, Newman S, Fox C BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21(1):121.

PMID: 33588768 PMC: 7885439. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01896-y.


Early detection of type 2 diabetes in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Stockholm - comparing reach of community and facility-based screening.

Timm L, Harcke K, Karlsson I, Annerstedt K, Alvesson H, Stattin N Glob Health Action. 2020; 13(1):1795439.

PMID: 32746747 PMC: 7480601. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1795439.


-Reversal of Diabetes Risk Through Dietary Changes in Older Persons with Prediabetes in Region Stockholm.

Timm L, Daivadanam M, Lager A, Forsberg B, Ostenson C, Alvesson H Nutrients. 2019; 11(11).

PMID: 31690003 PMC: 6893725. DOI: 10.3390/nu11112658.


References
1.
Griffin S, Little P, Hales C, Kinmonth A, Wareham N . Diabetes risk score: towards earlier detection of type 2 diabetes in general practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000; 16(3):164-71. DOI: 10.1002/1520-7560(200005/06)16:3<164::aid-dmrr103>3.0.co;2-r. View

2.
Shaw C, Abrams K, Marteau T . Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 49(12):1571-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00244-0. View

3.
Knowler W, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler S, Hamman R, Lachin J, Walker E . Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(6):393-403. PMC: 1370926. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512. View

4.
Wylie G, Hungin A, Neely J . Impaired glucose tolerance: qualitative and quantitative study of general practitioners' knowledge and perceptions. BMJ. 2002; 324(7347):1190. PMC: 111113. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1190. View

5.
Adriaanse M, Snoek F, Dekker J, VAN DER Ploeg H, Heine R . Screening for Type 2 diabetes: an exploration of subjects' perceptions regarding diagnosis and procedure. Diabet Med. 2002; 19(5):406-11. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00710.x. View