» Articles » PMID: 17761792

Applicability of a Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Predicting the Whole Body Skeletal Muscle Volume

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 1
PMID 17761792
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that a segmental bioelectrical impedance (BI) analysis can predict whole body skeletal muscle (SM) volume more accurately than a whole body BI analysis. Thirty males (19-34 yr) participated in this study. They were divided into validation (n = 20) and cross-validation groups (n = 10). The BI values were obtained using two methods: whole body BI analysis, which determines impedance between the wrist and ankle; and segmental BI analysis, which determines the impedance of every body segment in both sides of the upper arm, lower arm, upper leg and lower leg, and five parts of the trunk. Using a magnetic resonance imaging method, whole body SM volume was determined as a reference (SMV(MRI)). Simple and multiple regression analyses were applied to (length)(2)/Z (BI index) for the whole body and for every body segment, respectively, to develop the prediction equations of SMV(MRI). In the validation group, there were no significant differences between the measured and estimated SMV and no systematic errors in either BI analysis. In the cross-validation group, the whole body BI analysis produced systematic errors and resulted in the overestimation of SMV(MRI), but the segmental BI analysis was cross-validated. In the pooled data, the segmental BI analysis produced a prediction equation, which involves the BI indexes of the trunk and upper thigh as independent variables, with a SE of estimation of 1,693.8 cm(3) (6.1%). Thus the findings obtained here indicated that the segmental BI analysis is superior to the whole body BI analysis for estimating SMV(MRI).

Citing Articles

Relationship between 10 repetition maximum for chest press, leg press, and muscle mass measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis in healthy young adults.

Sugimoto H, Taga M, Fukushima K, Akashi Y, Momose K J Phys Ther Sci. 2025; 37(2):77-83.

PMID: 39902303 PMC: 11787865. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.37.77.


Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in the older adults with metabolic syndrome: equipment-specific equation development.

Kim Y, Beom J, Lee S, Jang H, Kim K, Kim M Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024; 37(1):12.

PMID: 39725814 PMC: 11671549. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-024-02898-1.


Relationships between trunk tissue distribution, metabolic risk factors and physical performance in young people-A pilot study.

Ishiguro-Tanaka N, Kitagawa F, Akima H Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2024; 45(1).

PMID: 39709534 PMC: 11663261. DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12922.


Can the Total Body Water and Total Fat Mass Predict Kidney Stone Recurrence in Overweight and Obese Patients?.

Pricop C, Ivanuta M, Nikolic M, Ivanuta A, Botnariu G, Stan A Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73367.

PMID: 39659337 PMC: 11631159. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73367.


Appendicular Muscle Mass Index was Stronger than Body Mass Index in Association with Atherosclerosis in the Community-Dwelling Elderly.

Zhang Y, Fujiyoshi A, Higashiyama A, Utsumi M, Takeshita T, Miyai N J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023; 30(12):1882-1892.

PMID: 37407496 PMC: 10703568. DOI: 10.5551/jat.64165.