» Articles » PMID: 17761117

Managing Drugs and Devices in Patients with Permanent Ventricular Assist Devices

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 1
PMID 17761117
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patients will be considered for destination mechanical circulatory support device (MCSD) implantation when all other organ-saving treatment options have failed and they are not eligible for heart transplantation. Current medical evidence suggests that only for those patients who are inotrope-dependent and therefore likely have a 1-year survival probability without MCSD implantation of less than 50%, MCSD intervention will add to survival and quality-of-life benefit. Suitable candidates for MCSD are those patients who have a high risk of dying from heart failure but acceptable noncardiac risk. Evaluation of patients for MCSD requires a systematic and critical review of all organ systems and of the psychosocial situation. Specifically, right ventricular function and risk of right ventricular failure should be evaluated before planning destination MCSD implantation. Treatment will focus on prompt recovery from MCSD implantation, maintaining optimal treatment for heart failure, and preventing/treating MCSD complications, including infection, bleeding, coagulopathy, right heart failure, and device dysfunction. MCSD programs should be organized as an advanced heart failure center directed by specialized heart failure cardiologists, surgeons expert at implant and management of MCSD, specialized nurses, social workers, psychologists, financial experts, and physical therapists. MCSD practice is based on a patient-centered theory, with an appropriate understanding of the respective roles of the physician and the patient during their iterative encounters in which the patient is an autonomous person making responsible personal health decisions while the health care team is providing continued expert and empathic counseling about various options, based on systematic outcomes research (eg, by participation in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support - MCSD database ).

References
1.
Nieminen M, Brutsaert D, Dickstein K, Drexler H, Follath F, Harjola V . EuroHeart Failure Survey II (EHFS II): a survey on hospitalized acute heart failure patients: description of population. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27(22):2725-36. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl193. View

2.
Lazar R, Shapiro P, Jaski B, Parides M, Bourge R, Watson J . Neurological events during long-term mechanical circulatory support for heart failure: the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) experience. Circulation. 2004; 109(20):2423-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000129414.95137.CD. View

3.
Poston R, Husain S, Sorce D, Stanford E, Kusne S, Wagener M . LVAD bloodstream infections: therapeutic rationale for transplantation after LVAD infection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003; 22(8):914-21. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(02)00645-9. View

4.
Letsou G, Shah N, Gregoric I, Myers T, Delgado R, Frazier O . Gastrointestinal bleeding from arteriovenous malformations in patients supported by the Jarvik 2000 axial-flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24(1):105-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.10.018. View

5.
Schoolwerth A, Sica D, Ballermann B, Wilcox C . Renal considerations in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease and the Council for High Blood Pressure Research of the American Heart.... Circulation. 2001; 104(16):1985-91. DOI: 10.1161/hc4101.096153. View