» Articles » PMID: 1773953

Postoperative Changes in Collagen Synthesis in Intestinal Anastomoses of the Rat: Differences Between Small and Large Bowel

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1991 Dec 1
PMID 1773953
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Collagen synthesis is an essential feature of anastomotic healing in the intestine. Postoperative collagen synthesis, measured in vitro in intestinal anastomoses was studied from three hours to 28 days after operation. For this purpose, an ileal and a colonic anastomosis were constructed within the same animal and the results in both intestinal segments were compared. In the ileum, collagen synthesis was significantly increased, with respect to unoperated controls, three hours after operation. It remained raised during the period of study, with a maximal 10-fold stimulation four days after operation, and had nearly returned to the preoperative level after four weeks. The general pattern was the same in the colon, although quantitatively different: the increase in synthetic activity was delayed in comparison with the ileum. Maximal stimulation was approximately six-fold. In addition, we calculated the ratio for each rat between anastomotic collagen synthesis and the average value found in non-operated control animals. Postoperative stimulation in the ileum was higher than in the colon in almost every animal examined. The results show that the ileum responds more quickly and strongly to wounding than the colon, at least as far as the production of new collagen is concerned. Possibly, this phenomenon contributes to the lower failure rate apparent for anastomoses in the small bowel.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of Side-to-End and End-to-End intestinal anastomosis techniques: insights from a rat model study.

Shishegar A, Tahmasian M, Ashjaei A, Mirzaii-Dizgah I, Samizadeh E BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):421.

PMID: 39731007 PMC: 11673687. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02622-w.


Physical pressure resistance of gastrointestinal anastomotic site via plate of polyglycolic acid promoting fibrosis.

Tanda H, Shibutani M, Natsuki S, Kasashima H, Fukuoka T, Maeda K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26124.

PMID: 39478128 PMC: 11525944. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77894-6.


The Degradation of Absorbable Surgical Threads in Body Fluids: Insights from Infrared Spectroscopy Studies.

Merkel K, Grzybowska K, Strach A, Gierek M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39457115 PMC: 11508208. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011333.


The Effect of Local Papaverine Use in an Experimental High-Risk Colonic Anastomosis Model: Reduced Inflammatory Findings and Less Necrosis.

Ozdemir D, Karayigit A, Tekin E, Kocaturk E, Bal C, Ozer I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39337124 PMC: 11433639. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185638.


The Effectiveness of Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Mixed with Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Healing of Inflammatory Bowel Anastomoses: A Pre-Clinical Study in Rats.

Geropoulos G, Psarras K, Papaioannou M, Geropoulos V, Niti A, Nikolaidou C J Pers Med. 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38276243 PMC: 10817310. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010121.


References
1.
Khoury G, Waxman B . Large bowel anastomoses. I. The healing process and sutured anastomoses. A review. Br J Surg. 1983; 70(2):61-3. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800700202. View

2.
Hesp F, Hendriks T, LUBBERS E, deBoer H . Wound healing in the intestinal wall. A comparison between experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984; 27(2):99-104. DOI: 10.1007/BF02553985. View

3.
Fielding L, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G . Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J. 1980; 281(6237):411-4. PMC: 1713296. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.281.6237.411. View

4.
Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B . Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. III. Collagen metabolism in the colon after left colon resection. Am J Surg. 1980; 139(3):398-405. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90302-5. View

5.
Hendriks T, Mastboom W . Healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Parameters for repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990; 33(10):891-901. DOI: 10.1007/BF02051930. View