» Articles » PMID: 17713767

Spatial Orientation in the Bushcricket Leptophyes Punctatissima (Phaneropterinae; Orthoptera): III. Peripheral Directionality and Central Nervous Processing of Spatial Cues

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Aug 24
PMID 17713767
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examined peripheral and central nervous cues underlying the ability of the bushcricket Leptophyes punctatissima to orient to elevated and depressed sound sources broadcasting the female acoustic reply. The peripheral spatial directionality of the ear was measured physiologically using monaural preparations of an auditory interneuron (T-fibre). In the azimuth, maximal interaural intensity differences of 18 dB occur between ipsi- and contralateral stimulation. With increasing elevation or depression of the sound sources, IIDs decrease systematically and reach zero with the source exactly above or below the preparation. Bilateral, simultaneous recordings of the activity of the pair of interneurons allowed determining the binaural discharge differences which occur in response to the extremely short (1 ms) female reply. These discharge differences are large (four action potentials/stimulus) and reliable in the azimuth with lateral stimulation, and decrease gradually with more frontal stimulation. With elevation and depression of sound sources these differences again decrease to one action potential/stimulus at 60 degrees or 75 degrees elevation, and lateral stimulus angles of about 60 degrees . We also calculated the reliability with which a receiver could correctly determine the location of the sound source. We discuss these quantitative measures in relation to the spatial phonotactic behaviour of male L. punctatissima.

Citing Articles

Comparative micromechanics of bushcricket ears with and without a specialized auditory fovea region in the crista acustica.

Scherberich J, Taszus R, Stoessel A, Nowotny M Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1929):20200909.

PMID: 32576108 PMC: 7329045. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0909.


Phonotactic steering and representation of directional information in the ascending auditory pathway of a cricket.

Lv M, Zhang X, Hedwig B J Neurophysiol. 2020; 123(3):865-875.

PMID: 31913780 PMC: 7099476. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00737.2019.


Position-dependent hearing in three species of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera).

Lakes-Harlan R, Scherberich J R Soc Open Sci. 2015; 2(6):140473.

PMID: 26543574 PMC: 4632538. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.140473.


Directional hearing: from biophysical binaural cues to directional hearing outdoors.

Romer H J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014; 201(1):87-97.

PMID: 25231204 PMC: 4282874. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0939-6.


Neuronal correlates of a preference for leading signals in the synchronizing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).

Siegert M, Romer H, Hashim R, Hartbauer M J Exp Biol. 2011; 214(Pt 23):3924-34.

PMID: 22071183 PMC: 3236105. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.057901.

References
1.
Ebendt R, Friedel J, Kalmring K . Central projection of auditory receptors in the prothoracic ganglion of the buschcricket Psorodonotus illyricus (tettigoniidae): computer-aided analysis of the end branch pattern. J Neurobiol. 1994; 25(1):35-49. DOI: 10.1002/neu.480250104. View

2.
Faure P, Hoy R . Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones. J Exp Biol. 2000; 203(Pt 21):3225-42. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.21.3225. View

3.
Rheinlaender J, Hartbauer M, Romer H . Spatial orientation in the bushcricket Leptophyes punctatissima (Phaneropterinae; Orthoptera): I. Phonotaxis to elevated and depressed sound sources. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006; 193(3):313-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-006-0186-6. View

4.
Pollack G . Encoding of sound localization cues by an identified auditory interneuron: effects of stimulus temporal pattern. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 88(5):2322-8. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00119.2002. View

5.
Searle C, Braida L, Cuddy D, Davis M . Binaural pinna disparity: another auditory localization cue. J Acoust Soc Am. 1975; 57(2):448-55. DOI: 10.1121/1.380442. View