» Articles » PMID: 17705836

Information from the Internet and the Doctor-patient Relationship: the Patient Perspective--a Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal BMC Fam Pract
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2007 Aug 21
PMID 17705836
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Both doctors and patients may perceive the Internet as a potential challenge to existing therapeutic relationships. Here we examine patients' views of the effect of the Internet on their relationship with doctors.

Methods: We ran 8 disease specific focus groups of between 2 and 8 respondents comprising adult patients with diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease or hepatitis C.

Results: Data are presented on (i) the perceived benefits and (ii) limitations of the Internet in the context of the doctor-patient relationship, (iii) views on sharing information with doctors, and (iv) the potential of the Internet for the future. Information from the Internet was particularly valued in relation to experiential knowledge.

Conclusion: Despite evidence of increasing patient activism in seeking information and the potential to challenge the position of the doctor, the accounts here do not in any way suggest a desire to disrupt the existing balance of power, or roles, in the consultation. Patients appear to see the Internet as an additional resource to support existing and valued relationships with their doctors. Doctors therefore need not feel challenged or threatened when patients bring health information from the Internet to a consultation, rather they should see it as an attempt on the part of the patient to work with the doctor and respond positively.

Citing Articles

Relationship between evaluation factors and star ratings for Japanese community healthcare institutions in electronic word-of-mouth reviews: an observational study.

Maita H, Kanezaki Y, Akimoto T, Kobayashi T, Hirano T, Kato H BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):413.

PMID: 39633284 PMC: 11619464. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02668-y.


Internet usage time and trust in doctors: evidence from China.

Gao Q, Wang X, Lin Z, Liao Z BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2891.

PMID: 39434022 PMC: 11492780. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20395-y.


Patient considerations for orthodontists: A comparative study of university students in Malaysia and Taiwan.

Yuo T, Cheng J, Chen D, Sarah Samson R, Varghese E, Bayarsaikhan O J Dent Sci. 2024; 19(4):1991-1998.

PMID: 39347045 PMC: 11437273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.07.003.


Digital Media Usage Behavior and Its Impact on the Physician-Patient Relationship: Cross-Sectional Study Among Individuals Affected by Psoriasis in Germany.

Erbas M, Ziehfreund S, Wecker H, Biedermann T, Zink A J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e57823.

PMID: 39110972 PMC: 11339573. DOI: 10.2196/57823.


Caution Regarding ChatGPT's Appropriateness and Reliability Regarding Surgery for Wrist Arthritis.

Hones K, Krisanda E, Chim H Hand (N Y). 2024; :15589447241265519.

PMID: 39045653 PMC: 11571340. DOI: 10.1177/15589447241265519.


References
1.
Cotten S, Gupta S . Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(9):1795-806. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020. View

2.
Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L . How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ. 2004; 328(7439):564. PMC: 381051. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.564. View

3.
Kerr C, Murray E, Stevenson F, Gore C, Nazareth I . Interactive health communication applications for chronic disease: patient and carer perspectives. J Telemed Telecare. 2005; 11 Suppl 1:32-4. DOI: 10.1258/1357633054461912. View

4.
Newnham G, Burns W, Snyder R, Dowling A, Ranieri N, Gray E . Attitudes of oncology health professionals to information from the Internet and other media. Med J Aust. 2005; 183(4):197-200. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06996.x. View

5.
Nettleton S, Burrows R, OMalley L . The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. Sociol Health Illn. 2005; 27(7):972-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00466.x. View