» Articles » PMID: 17705083

Isobaric Gasless Laparoscopy Versus Minilaparotomy in Uterine Myomectomy: a Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Aug 21
PMID 17705083
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Isobaric gasless laparoscopy and minilaparotomy have been used as more recent minimally invasive approaches to myomectomy. This randomized trial aimed to compare the surgical and immediate postoperative outcomes for myomectomy performed by isobaric gasless laparoscopy with those for minilaparotomy.

Methods: A total of 100 patients with symptomatic uterine myomas requiring myomectomy were randomly allocated to the gasless laparoscopy group or the minilaparotomy group. The randomization procedure was based on a computer-generated list. The primary outcome was a comparison of the discharge times between the two procedures. A power calculation verified that more than 26 patients for each group was necessary to detect a difference of more than 24 h in discharge time with an alpha error level of 5% and a beta error of 80%. Continuous outcome variables were analyzed using the Student's t-test. Discrete variables were analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean discharge time was longer for minilaparotomy than for gasless laparoscopy (98.4 +/- 1.4 vs 52.8 +/- 1.6 h; p < 0.001). Gasless laparoscopy resulted in shorter times for canalization (21.6 +/- 1.1 vs 32 +/- 1.3 h; p < 0.05) and surgery (79.5 +/- 25.1 vs 103.5 +/- 24.9 min; p < 0.001). The intraoperative blood loss was less with gasless laparoscopy (154.2 +/- 1.2 vs 188.6 +/- 1.3 ml; p < 0.001). No intraoperative complications occurred, and no case was returned to the theater in either group. No conversion to standard laparotomy was necessary.

Conclusions: Isobaric gasless laparoscopy and minilaparotomy can be suitable options for uterine myomectomy. Several surgical and immediate postoperative outcomes were significantly better in the gasless laparoscopy group than in the minilaparotomy group. However, further controlled prospective studies are required to confirm the results.

Citing Articles

Perioperative and reproductive outcomes' comparison of mini-laparotomy and laparoscopic myomectomy in the management of uterine leiomyomas: a systematic review.

Tsiampa E, Tsiampas K, Kapogiannis F Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 309(3):821-829.

PMID: 37566224 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07168-5.


Clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopic surgery for abdominal conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aruparayil N, Bolton W, Mishra A, Bains L, Gnanaraj J, KING R Surg Endosc. 2021; 35(12):6427-6437.

PMID: 34398284 PMC: 8599349. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08677-7.


Risk of recurrence of uterine leiomyomas following laparoscopic myomectomy compared with open myomectomy.

Ming X, Ran X, Li N, Nie D, Li Z Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 301(1):235-242.

PMID: 31781891 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05399-z.


A systematic review on efficacy and safety of gasless laparoscopy in the management of uterine leiomyoma.

Liu Q, Han T, Yang M, Tong X, Wang J J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2016; 36(1):142-149.

PMID: 26838756 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-016-1557-z.


Hybrid laparoscopic myomectomy: A novel technique.

Yang Y, Jin C, Oh K, Park J Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015; 58(5):401-4.

PMID: 26430666 PMC: 4588846. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.5.401.


References
1.
Damiani A, Melgrati L, Marziali M, Sesti F . Gasless laparoscopic myomectomy. Indications, surgical technique and advantages of a new procedure for removing uterine leiomyomas. J Reprod Med. 2003; 48(10):792-8. View

2.
Sesti F, Melgrati L, Damiani A, Piccione E . Isobaric (gasless) laparoscopic uterine myomectomy. An overview. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 129(1):9-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.027. View

3.
Damiani A, Melgrati L, Marziali M, Sesti F, Piccione E . Laparoscopic myomectomy for very large myomas using an isobaric (gasless) technique. JSLS. 2005; 9(4):434-8. PMC: 3015631. View

4.
Pelosi 2nd M, Pelosi 3rd M . Pelosi minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a non-endoscopic minimally invasive alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy. Surg Technol Int. 2005; 13:157-67. View

5.
Wallach E, Vlahos N . Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104(2):393-406. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000136079.62513.39. View