» Articles » PMID: 1770365

Mechanical Stability of Porous-coated Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal J Arthroplasty
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1991 Dec 1
PMID 1770365
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Five different porous-coated acetabular prosthetic configurations underwent in vitro testing to assess mechanical stability in embalmed cadaver hemipelves: Harris Galante II cup with three cancellous screws, Biomet Universal cup, Whiteside cup with peripheral pegs, Whiteside cup with two cancellous screws, and plain Whiteside cup. Following implantation in a neutral frame, cyclic load testing was done using 33 specimens at 100-kg load for 100,000 cycles using an MTS machine (MTS Systems Corp., Minneapolis, MN). Subsequently, static load-to-failure testing was done in all specimens. Subsidence and micromovement were determined for each specimen using linear variable differential transformers. With cyclic testing, overall cup subsidence revealed a significant increase, from 500 to 100,000 cycles. Overall cup micromovement revealed a significant decrease, and all cup groups demonstrated less than 125 microns (.125 mm) of average mean micromotion at the completion of cyclic testing. The best cup configuration was a 1-mm, oversized, press-fit cup using two 6.5 cancellous screws for additional fixation, which revealed an average mean of 60 microns (.06 mm) of micromovement. Static load testing revealed unacceptable micromovement over 150 microns (.150 mm) in most cups with 300-kg loads.

Citing Articles

Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Management and Functional Outcomes.

Fontanellas-Fes A, Lizano-Diez X, Leon-Garcia A, Pardo I Pol A, Martinez-Diaz S, Andriola V Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(5):2615-2620.

PMID: 39251435 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02636-2.


Primary Stability in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: Comparison of the Stability of Cementless Fixed Augments on a Modular Acetabular Cage System with and without Cranial Straps.

Jaenisch M, Kohlhof H, Wirtz D, Schildberg F, Beckmann N, Kretzer J J Clin Med. 2021; 10(17).

PMID: 34501450 PMC: 8432542. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10174002.


Comparison of Test Setups for the Experimental Evaluation of the Primary Fixation Stability of Acetabular Cups.

Schulze C, Vogel D, Mallow S, Bader R Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(18).

PMID: 32916802 PMC: 7559462. DOI: 10.3390/ma13183982.


Management of intraoperative acetabular fracture in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Li J, Ji Q, Ni M, Zheng Q, Sun J, Zhang G BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21(1):383.

PMID: 32539748 PMC: 7296652. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03356-5.


Two Different Methods to Measure the Stability of Acetabular Implants: A Comparison Using Artificial Acetabular Models.

Goossens Q, Pastrav L, Mulier M, Desmet W, Vander Sloten J, Denis K Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(1).

PMID: 31906330 PMC: 6983091. DOI: 10.3390/s20010254.