» Articles » PMID: 17701323

Fluoride Release for Restorative Materials and Its Effect on Biofilm Formation in Natural Saliva

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Aug 19
PMID 17701323
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the influence of natural saliva of varying pH on surface biofilm formation of restorative materials and how this influenced fluoride release. Columnar specimens of glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), compomer, giomer and composite, were prepared, matured for 24 h at 37 degrees C and 100% humidity, lapped and then placed in natural stimulated saliva with a pH of 3.8 or 7.1. Fluoride release was determined daily using an ion-selective electrode. The surfaces of selected specimens were observed using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy in conjunction with a fluorescent dye. The surface biofilm formation and bacterial growth was most dominant under neutral conditions and on the surfaces of GICs compared with other materials. GICs released significantly higher amounts of fluoride than other materials. The results suggest that the increased fluoride release of GICs did not reduce the amount of bacterial growth and biofilm formation on the surfaces of these materials when stored in natural saliva.

Citing Articles

Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An Study.

Tu Y, Deng S, Wang Y, Lin X, Yang Z Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2022; 2022:9595067.

PMID: 35959001 PMC: 9359852. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9595067.


The effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of glass-ionomer cement.

Noori A, Kareem F Heliyon. 2019; 5(10):e02568.

PMID: 31667407 PMC: 6812241. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02568.


Factors influencing fluoride release in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) materials: A review.

Kumari P, Khijmatgar S, Chowdhury A, Lynch E, Chowdhury C J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019; 9(4):315-320.

PMID: 31334004 PMC: 6624238. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.06.015.


Biofilm formation affects surface properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.

Hyun H, Salehi S, Ferracane J Dent Mater. 2015; 31(12):1599-608.

PMID: 26590029 PMC: 4699808. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.011.


Evaluation of pH at the bacteria-dental cement interface.

Mayanagi G, Igarashi K, Washio J, Nakajo K, Domon-Tawaraya H, Takahashi N J Dent Res. 2011; 90(12):1446-50.

PMID: 21933936 PMC: 4077519. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511423392.


References
1.
Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Sato W, Kawai K, Torii M, Ebisu S . Weight change of various light-cured restorative materials after water immersion. Oper Dent. 1998; 23(3):132-7. View

2.
Young A, Von Der Fehr F, Sonju T, Nordbo H . Fluoride release and uptake in vitro from a composite resin and two orthodontic adhesives. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996; 54(4):223-8. DOI: 10.3109/00016359609003528. View

3.
Tay F, Pashley E, Huang C, Hashimoto M, Sano H, Smales R . The glass-ionomer phase in resin-based restorative materials. J Dent Res. 2002; 80(9):1808-12. DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800090701. View

4.
McCabe J, Rusby S . Water absorption, dimensional change and radial pressure in resin matrix dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004; 25(18):4001-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.088. View

5.
Sales D, Sae-Lee D, Matsuya S, Ana I . Short-term fluoride and cations release from polyacid-modified composites in a distilled water, and an acidic lactate buffer. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(10):1687-96. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00545-8. View