» Articles » PMID: 17699658

The Sources of Variability in Saccadic Eye Movements

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 Aug 19
PMID 17699658
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our movements are variable, but the origin of this variability is poorly understood. We examined the sources of variability in human saccadic eye movements. In two experiments, we measured the spatiotemporal variability in saccade trajectories as a function of movement direction and amplitude. One of our new observations is that the variability in movement direction is smaller for purely horizontal and vertical saccades than for saccades in oblique directions. We also found that saccade amplitude, duration, and peak velocity are all correlated with one another. To determine the origin of the observed variability, we estimated the noise in motor commands from the observed spatiotemporal variability, while taking into account the variability resulting from uncertainty in localization of the target. This analysis revealed that uncertainty in target localization is the major source of variability in saccade endpoints, whereas noise in the magnitude of the motor commands explains a slightly smaller fraction. In addition, there is temporal variability such that saccades with a longer than average duration have a smaller than average peak velocity. This noise model has a large generality because it correctly predicts the variability in other data sets, which contain saccades starting from very different initial locations. Because the temporal noise most likely originates in movement planning, and the motor command noise in movement execution, we conclude that uncertainty in sensory signals and noise in movement planning and execution all contribute to the variability in saccade trajectories. These results are important for understanding how the brain controls movement.

Citing Articles

Eyes and hand are both reliable at localizing somatosensory targets.

Naffrechoux M, Koun E, Volland F, Farne A, Roy A, Pelisson D Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(11):2653-2664.

PMID: 39340566 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06922-8.


Gaze-Based Detection of Thoughts across Naturalistic Tasks Using a PSO-Optimized Random Forest Algorithm.

Rahnuma T, Nanjappan Jothiraj S, Kuvar V, Faber M, Knight R, Kam J Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199718 PMC: 11351278. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080760.


Sensorimotor confidence for tracking eye movements.

Goettker A, Locke S, Gegenfurtner K, Mamassian P J Vis. 2024; 24(8):12.

PMID: 39177998 PMC: 11363210. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.8.12.


Context-dependence of deterministic and nondeterministic contributions to closed-loop steering control.

Egger S, Keemink S, Goldman M, Britten K bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131368 PMC: 11312469. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.26.605325.


Modeling kinematic variability reveals displacement and velocity based dual control of saccadic eye movements.

Vasudevan V, Murthy A, Padhi R Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(9):2159-2176.

PMID: 38980340 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06870-3.


References
1.
Demer J, Oh S, Poukens V . Evidence for active control of rectus extraocular muscle pulleys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41(6):1280-90. View

2.
Quaia C, Pare M, WURTZ R, Optican L . Extent of compensation for variations in monkey saccadic eye movements. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 132(1):39-51. DOI: 10.1007/s002219900324. View

3.
Oh S, Poukens V, Demer J . Quantitative analysis of rectus extraocular muscle layers in monkey and humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42(1):10-6. View

4.
Westheimer G . Relative localization in the human fovea: radial-tangential anisotropy. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1471):995-9. PMC: 1088699. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1614. View

5.
van der Geest J, Frens M . Recording eye movements with video-oculography and scleral search coils: a direct comparison of two methods. J Neurosci Methods. 2002; 114(2):185-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(01)00527-1. View