» Articles » PMID: 17699195

Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Patients with Non-Shiga Toxin-associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: Prognostic Significance of Genetic Background

Overview
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2007 Aug 21
PMID 17699195
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

More than 50% of patients with non-Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (non-Stx-HUS) progress to ESRD. Kidney transplant failure for disease recurrence is common; hence, whether renal transplantation is appropriate in this clinical setting remains a debated issue. The aim of this study was to identify possible prognostic factors for renal transplant outcome by focusing on specific genetic abnormalities associated with the disease. All articles in literature that describe renal transplant outcome in patients with ESRD secondary to non-Stx-HUS, genotyped for CFH, MCP, and IF mutations, were reviewed, and data of patients who were referred to the International Registry of Recurrent and Familial HUS/TTP and data from the Newcastle cohort were examined. This study confirmed that the overall outcome of kidney transplantation in patients with non-Stx-HUS is poor, with disease recurring in 60% of patients, 91.6% of whom developed graft failure. No clinical prognostic factor that could identify patients who were at high risk for graft failure was found. The presence of a factor H (CFH) mutation was associated with a high incidence of graft failure (77.8 versus 54.9% in patients without CFH mutation). Similar results were seen in patients with a factor I (IF) mutation. In contrast, graft outcome was favorable in all patients who carried a membrane co-factor protein (MCP) mutation. Patients with non-Stx-HUS should undergo genotyping before renal transplantation to help predict the risk for graft failure. It is debatable whether a kidney transplant should be recommended for patients with CFH or IF mutation. Reasonably, patients with an MCP mutation can undergo a kidney transplant without risk for recurrence.

Citing Articles

The outcome of thrombotic microangiopathy in kidney transplant recipients.

Haq K, Lin S, Dasgupta A, Obaidi Z, Bagnasco S, Maggiore U BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):433.

PMID: 39609684 PMC: 11606107. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03846-x.


Kidney Transplantation in Patients With aHUS: A Comparison of Eculizumab Prophylaxis Versus Rescue Therapy.

Duineveld C, Glover E, Bouwmeester R, van de Kar N, Kavanagh D, Wetzels J Transplantation. 2024; 109(3):511-518.

PMID: 39049128 PMC: 11834958. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005135.


The unanswered question. When to undertake a maternity journey?.

Younis D, Shemies R J Nephrol. 2024; 37(3):835-836.

PMID: 38285317 PMC: 11150280. DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01865-9.


New findings in preventing recurrence and improving renal function in AHUS patients after renal transplantation treated with eculizumab: a systemic review and meta-analyses.

Tang Z, Hui H, Shi C, Chen X Ren Fail. 2023; 45(1):2231264.

PMID: 37563792 PMC: 10424606. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2231264.


Case report: Novel FHR2 variants in atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A case study of a translational medicine approach in renal transplantation.

Stea E, Skerka C, Accetturo M, Pesce F, Wiech T, Hartman A Front Immunol. 2022; 13:1008294.

PMID: 36451836 PMC: 9703090. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1008294.